METHODS: The researchers conducted an in-depth focus group discussion in September 2022 involving seven participants representing key stakeholders in vaccine compensations from governmental agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and private institutions who were experts in litigation and legislation, consumer protection, and medical practices in Malaysia. The study utilised ATLAS.ti 22 to conduct a thematic analysis.
FINDINGS: The analysis yielded three themes: existing mechanisms and their challenges, the role of ADR, and the solution for a vaccine injury compensation mechanism. The participants shared their knowledge and experience regarding the existing vaccine compensation mechanisms in Malaysia, i.e. the common law of Tort and Consumer Protection Act 1999, and explained how each mechanism relates to specific challenges or arguments that provide the basis on which they are unable to accord fair compensation to the vaccine recipients. The participants debated the merits and disadvantages of the types of ADR for AEFI and unanimously proposed a specific healthcare centre for compensation (SHCC) as the most viable compensation mechanism for AEFI.
CONCLUSION: SHCC offers a new ADR to serve as a compensation mechanism for claimants affected by the COVID-19 vaccines while also contributing to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 16: peace, justice, and strong institutions.
Methods: A quantitative approach was applied, using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire, adapted from previous studies. Data were collected from 167 healthcare professionals working for Malaysian Public Hospitals in Penang. Smart Partial Least Square (PLS) version 3.2.7 were used to analyse the proposed relationships.
Results: The results indicated that attitude and computer anxiety had a significant positive relation to the intention to use PIS among healthcare professionals wherein computer knowledge was found to have had a significant relationship with attitude and computer habit. Apart from that, technical support and training had a positive relationship with perceived ease of use. Surprisingly, computer habit, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, compatibility and facilitating condition did not significantly influence intention to use PIS.
Conclusion: The results of this study provided useful insights for healthcare agencies to understand the underlying elements that could improve the poison information management. The results proved that attitude and computer anxiety were critical factors among healthcare professionals managing poisoning cases in a highly stressful and unpredictable work environment. These factors must, therefore, be considered before implementing PIS in managing poisoning cases. The study also provided an understanding of how to improve system development by utilising the end user's expectation on the implementation of the system.
SETTINGS AND DATA SOURCES: The poisoning enquiries database (2006-2015) from the Malaysia NPC was used for the analysis.
PARTICIPANTS: The NPC records all telephone calls that it manages using a validated and standardised form. Demographics and types of the poisoning exposure calls were extracted and descriptive analysis was applied.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of this study is to evaluate NPC data for trends in the poisoning exposure calls based on the types and modes of poisoning over a 10-year period. The secondary outcome is to evaluate the characteristics of human exposure cases based on the calls received by the NPC.
RESULTS: There was a notable increase in the number of poisoning exposure calls noticed during the 10-year period but dropped significantly in 2012. The highest number of poisoning exposure calls came from Selangor (21.0%), Perak (18.0%) and Negeri Sembilan (9.8%). More than half of the exposure was intentional (53.8%) involving more women (50.3%) as compared with men (41.9%), and in the 20-29 years age group category (33.5%). Exposure mostly occurred at home (96%) through the ingestion route (94.1%). Pharmaceutical products (40.5%), pesticides (31.7%) and household products (20.1%) were the common agents implicated for intentional exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing trend in enquiries on poisoning exposure calls made to the NPC. Most of the intentional poisoning exposures occurred among younger women and involved pharmaceuticals, pesticides or household products. Poisoning safety education and other interventions are needed to curb poisoning incidents.