Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Mistiran AF, Dzarr AA, Gan SH
    Toxicol. Mech. Methods, 2010 Oct;20(8):472-81.
    PMID: 20626302 DOI: 10.3109/15376516.2010.503246
    This paper describes a new validated high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the simultaneous determination of two anti-cancer drugs, Arabinoside-C (Ara-C) and doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX). A simultaneous determination method saves cost and time as both drugs can be injected into a single HPLC system without the need to change or re-equilibrate with a new mobile phase. The objective of the study is to develop a simultaneous determination method of two anti-cancer drugs, Ara-C and DOX. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture (45:55) of acetonitrile:ammonium hydrogen phosphate aqueous solution (0.01 M) at pH 6.2 at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min, with UV detection at 252 nm. Separation was achieved on a C-18 column (5 µm: 250 mm × 4.6 mm) maintained at 30°C in a column oven. The method was linear between 325 ng/ml and 10 µg/ml for Ara-C and 625 ng/ml and 20 µg/ml for DOX. The limit of detection (LOD) was 20 ng/ml for Ara-C and 60 ng/ml for DOX. The developed HPLC method achieved good precision and accuracy as well as limit of quantitations. The developed and validated method is suitable to be used for routine analysis of Ara-C and DOX.
  2. Dzarr AA, Kamal M, Baba AA
    Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2009 Sep;13(4):250-4.
    PMID: 19386547 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2009.03.006
    This study assessed the agreement between infrared tympanic membrane (TM), axillary, corrected axillary (+0.5 degrees C), oral, and corrected oral (+0.3 degrees C) to rectal thermometry as reference standard in neutropenic adults. The sensitivity and specificity of the mentioned thermometries in detecting rectal fever (> or =38 degrees C) were also analysed.
  3. Ankathil R, Azlan H, Dzarr AA, Baba AA
    Pharmacogenomics, 2018 04;19(5):475-393.
    PMID: 29569526 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2017-0193
    Despite the excellent efficacy and improved clinical responses obtained with imatinib mesylate (IM), development of resistance in a significant proportion of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients on IM therapy have emerged as a challenging problem in clinical practice. Resistance to imatinib can be due to heterogeneous array of factors involving BCR/ABL-dependent and BCR/ABL-independent pathways. Although BCR/ABL mutation is the major contributory factor for IM resistance, reduced bio-availability of IM in leukemic cells is also an important pharmacokinetic factor that contributes to development of resistance to IM in CML patients. The contribution of polymorphisms of the pharmacogenes in relation to IM disposition and treatment outcomes have been studied by various research groups in numerous population cohorts. However, the conclusions arising from these studies have been highly inconsistent. This review encompasses an updated insight into the impact of pharmacogenetic variability on treatment response of IM in CML patients.
  4. Che Yaakob CA, Dzarr AA, Ismail AA, Zuky Nik Lah NA, Ho JJ
    PMID: 20556784 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007801.pub2
    BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic complications are much higher in pregnancy due to procoagulant changes. Heparin does not cross the placenta and the use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the current established practice in prophylaxis and treatment for thromboembolism in pregnancy.

    OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of anticoagulant therapies for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis in pregnancy. The anticoagulant drugs included are UFH, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin.

    SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (March 2010) and reference lists of retrieved studies.

    SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing any combination of warfarin, UFH, LMWH and placebo in pregnant women.

    DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used methods described in the Cochrane Handbooks for Systemic Reviews of Interventions for assessing the eligibility of studies identified by the search strategy. A minimum of two review authors independently assessed each study.

    MAIN RESULTS: We did not identify any eligible studies for inclusion in the review.We identified three potential studies; after assessing eligibility, we excluded all three as they did not meet the prespecified inclusion criteria. One study compared LMWH and UFH in pregnant women with previous thromboembolic events and, for most of these women, anticoagulants were used as thromboprophylaxis. There were only three women who had a thromboembolic event during the current pregnancy and it was unclear whether the anticoagulant was used as therapy or prophylaxis. We excluded one study because it included only women undergoing caesarean birth. The third study was not a randomised trial.

    AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of anticoagulation for deep vein thrombosis in pregnancy. Further studies are required.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links