MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four rats were divided into three groups: normal saline, octenidine dihydrochloride and povidone-iodine. Wounds were made on the rats' backs, and A. baumannii germs were inoculated into the wounds. After 3 hours, the wound was irrigated with wound cleansing solution according to the group for 30 seconds. Each wound was taken swab culture before and after wound irrigation and tissue culture 5 hours after wound irrigation.
RESULTS: All specimens showed bacterial colony growth with a median value of 1.22 × 105 CFU before irrigation. Wound irrigation with normal saline did not reduce colony counts, while there was a 3-log reduction to 5-log reduction in the octenidine and povidone-iodine groups. Statistically, there was no significant difference in the mean number of colonies between the octenidine and povidone-iodine groups after irrigation (p = 0.535). However, 3 hours after irrigation, all specimens that experienced 3-log reduction showed regrowth to more than 1 × 105 CFU. In contrast, specimens subjected to 5-log reduction did not exhibit any regrowth.
CONCLUSION: The antiseptic effectiveness of octenidine dihydrochloride is equivalent to povidone-iodine in eradicating A. baumannii colonies in wounds in vivo.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational study among burn patients with A.ba admitted to the Burn Unit at Dr. Soetomo Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. Potential risk factors for MDR-A.ba were analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis. The patients diagnosed with MDR-A.ba wound infection were included in the case group. The patients diagnosed with non MDR, these are: (1) the patients isolated micro-organisms other than A.ba, (2) sterile isolates, and (3) the patients isolated as A.ba but not MDR, were included in the control group.
RESULTS: A total of 120 burn patients were included in this study. During this study, 24% burn patients were found to have Acinetobacter baumannii and 79% (from 24% of Acinetobacter baumannii) had MDR-A.ba. According to univariate analysis, risk factors that significant were: Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) (p = 0,002; OR: 6.10; CI: 1,68 - 21,57); hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) (p < 0,000; OR: 6.95; CI: 2,56 - 18,91) and comorbid (p = 0,006; OR: 3,72; CI: 1,44 - 9,58). But, after analysed by multivariate analysis, only ABSI was the significant factor (p = 0,010; OR: 1,70; CI: 1,23 - 2,36).
CONCLUSION: Based on univariate analysis, the significant risk factors for MDR-A.ba were: ABSI, hospital length of stay and comorbid. But after adjusted by multivariate analysis, only ABSI was the significant factor.