MyMedR

Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Navigation-assisted maxillofacial reconstruction: accuracy and predictability

Soh HY, Hu LH, Yu Y, Wang T, Zhang WB, Peng X

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021 Nov 30.
PMID: 34862088 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.11.008

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of navigation-assisted maxillofacial reconstruction and to identify the predictors of the clinical outcomes. A total of 112 patients who underwent navigation-assisted maxillofacial reconstruction with free flaps between 2014 and 2019, performed by a single surgical team, were assessed. Accuracy was evaluated by superimposing the postoperative computed tomography data with the preoperative virtual surgical plan. Predictors of the clinical outcomes affecting the accuracy were identified and analysed. The mean deviation and root mean square (RMS) estimate of the orbital, maxillary, and mandibular reconstructions were 0.88 ± 3.25 mm and 3.38 ± 0.73 mm, 0.77 ± 3.44 mm and 3.69 ± 0.82 mm, and 1.07 ± 4.16 mm and 4.67 ± 3.95 mm, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in orbital volume or projection between the preoperative, postoperative, and healthy orbits (P = 0.093 and P = 0.225, respectively). Multivariate linear regression analysis confirmed significant associations between the accuracy of navigation-assisted mandibular reconstruction and preservation of the condyle, type of reconstruction, type of osteosynthesis plate, and number of bony segments. Navigation-assisted midface reconstruction yielded a higher level of accuracy in the final surgical outcome when compared to mandibular reconstruction. Computer-assisted techniques and intraoperative navigation can be an alternative or adjunct to current surgical techniques to improve the final surgical outcome, especially in more complex maxillofacial reconstructions.
Accuracy of globe-sparing orbital reconstruction using individually bent titanium mesh: A comparative study

Soh HY, Sun Q, Hu LH, Wang Y, Mao C, Peng X, et al.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2022 Jan 23.
PMID: 35168922 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.01.032

Accurate reconstruction of orbital and midfacial defects following extensive globe-sparing maxillectomy is challenging, due to the complex anatomy of facial skeleton. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of individually bent titanium mesh in navigation-assisted reconstruction of post-ablative orbits in comparison with that without intraoperative navigation. Forty-one patients undergone globe-sparing maxillectomy and orbital floor reconstruction using individually bent titanium mesh with or without intraoperative navigation were assessed. Pre- and postoperative orbital projection and volume measurements were performed on both orbits. The unaffected orbit was used as a control for comparison. True-to-original orbital reconstruction was achieved in this study. The average difference of globe projection and orbital volume between unaffected and reconstructed orbits was 0.8 ± 0.5 mm and 0.9 ± 1.2cm3, respectively, in navigation-assisted group. In non-navigation-assisted group, the average difference of globe projection and orbital volume of unaffected and reconstructed orbit was 0.7 ± 0.5 mm and 1.3 ± 1.3cm3, respectively. There was no statistical significance in mean differences between unaffected and affected globe projection (P = 0.744) and orbital volume (P = 0.677) in both groups. There was also no significant difference observed when comparing the mean differences between pre- and postoperative globe projection (P = 0.659) and orbital volume (P = 0.582) in both groups. While intraoperative navigation system was shown to be effective in orbital reconstruction in the past decade, equal satisfactory post-ablative orbital reconstruction can be achieved with individually bent titanium mesh with or without intraoperative navigation.
Fulltext Accuracy of Mixed Reality Combined With Surgical Navigation Assisted Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor Resection

Tang ZN, Hu LH, Soh HY, Yu Y, Zhang WB, Peng X

Front Oncol, 2021;11:715484.
PMID: 35096559 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.715484

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of mixed reality combined with surgical navigation in oral and maxillofacial tumor surgery.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of data of seven patients with oral and maxillofacial tumors who underwent surgery between January 2019 and January 2021 using a combination of mixed reality and surgical navigation. Virtual surgical planning and navigation plan were based on preoperative CT datasets. Through IGT-Link port, mixed reality workstation was synchronized with surgical navigation, and surgical planning data were transferred to the mixed reality workstation. Osteotomy lines were marked with the aid of both surgical navigation and mixed reality images visualized through HoloLens. Frozen section examination was used to ensure negative surgical margins. Postoperative CT datasets were obtained 1 week after the surgery, and chromatographic analysis of virtual osteotomies and actual osteotomies was carried out. Patients received standard oncological postoperative follow-up.
Results: Of the seven patients, four had maxillary tumors and three had mandibular tumors. There were total of 13 osteotomy planes. Mean deviation between the planned osteotomy plane and the actual osteotomy plane was 1.68 ± 0.92 mm; the maximum deviation was 3.46 mm. Chromatographic analysis showed error of ≤3 mm for 80.16% of the points. Mean deviations of maxillary and mandibular osteotomy lines were approximate (1.60 ± 0.93 mm vs. 1.86 ± 0.93 mm). While five patients had benign tumors, two had malignant tumors. Mean deviations of osteotomy lines was comparable between patients with benign and malignant tumors (1.48 ± 0.74 mm vs. 2.18 ± 0.77 mm). Intraoperative frozen pathology confirmed negative resection margins in all cases. No tumor recurrence or complications occurred during mean follow-up of 15.7 months (range, 6-26 months).
Conclusion: The combination of mixed reality technology and surgical navigation appears to be feasible, safe, and effective for tumor resection in the oral and maxillofacial region.
Outcome Evaluation of Three-Dimensionally Printed Patient-Specific Surgical Plates for Mandibular Reconstruction

Zhang WB, Wang CF, Yu Y, Liu S, Hu LH, Soh HY, et al.

Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr, 2024 Aug 03.
PMID: 39553818 DOI: 10.1177/19433875241272441

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective and retrospective studies.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effects and accuracy of three-dimensionally (3D)-printed patient-specific surgical plates used for mandibular defect reconstruction.
METHODS: This study included patients who underwent mandibular defect reconstruction with vascularized autogenous bone grafts between January 2012 and August 2021. They were divided into experimental (fixation with 3D-printed surgical plates) and control (fixation with conventional surgical plates) groups. Flap survival rate, postoperative complications and patient self-evaluated facial appearance were compared. Mandibular reconstruction accuracy evaluation included postoperative position deviation of the whole mandible, transplanted bone graft, lower mandibular border, mandibular condyle, and mandibular angle on the reconstructed side compared to baseline.
RESULTS: This study included 20 patients (14 males, six females; age, 39.45 ± 11.69 years), ten each in the experimental and control groups. The mean follow-up was 16 ± 22.05 (range, 6-99) months. All procedures were successful, no plate-related complications (breakage, loosening, or exposure of the surgical plates) were reported, and all patients were satisfied. The groups were statistically similar in th e position deviation of the whole mandible, transplanted bone graft, mandibular condyle, and mandibular angle, but the position and morphology of the lower mandibular border on the reconstructed side in the experimental group were better than those in the control group (P = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed patient-specific surgical plates could be applied in mandibular reconstruction safely and effectively, simplifying the surgical procedure, shortening the preoperative preparation times, achieving satisfactory outcomes, and improving the clinical effects and accuracy of individualized mandibular reconstruction.