Displaying 1 publication

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Adams RH, Domínguez-Rodríguez VI, Joel Zavala-Cruz
    Sains Malaysiana, 2015;44:337-346.
    Using the Microtox bioassay toxicity was determined in 16 areas located in eight sites: In contaminated areas, in areas
    with natural recovery, after bioremediation and phytoremediation projects and in control areas (uncontaminated). These
    areas correspond to the following ecosystems: mangrove, fresh water swamp (Pachira aquatica), marsh and pasture (in
    the coastal plain and Pliocene-Pleistocene terraces). A significant toxicity was detected in uncontaminated organic
    soils (22.2-49.1 toxicity units (TU)) which were comparable to levels found in hydrocarbon contaminated areas (22.3-
    42.0 TU). Generally, the toxicity in organic soils was much higher than that found in mineral soils (which was from
    below quantification levels to 9.3 TU). In an area restored by phytoremediation, the simple method used by Petróleos
    Mexicanos achieved recovery and superficial detoxification in the treated plot, exhibiting a toxicity reduction of 2.4 times
    with respect to untreated soil and a toxicity even slightly lower than the uncontaminated control in the same ecosystem
    (22.2 TU). Likewise, a bioremediation project in pasture resulted in a toxicity reduction down to levels comparable to
    uncontaminated soil (from below quantification levels to 7.9 TU). A tendency to decrease toxicity in organic soils during
    the rainy season was observed, toxicity drop in 80% of the areas sampled. Based on these findings, recommendations
    are presented for use of this test method in regional diagnostic studies.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links