Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Kamaruzzaman SN, Egbu CO, Zawawi EM, Karim SB, Woon CJ
    Environ Monit Assess, 2015 May;187(5):242.
    PMID: 25864077 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4447-0
    It is accepted that occupants who are more satisfied with their workplace's building internal environment are more productive. The main objective of the study was to measure the occupants' level of satisfaction and the perceived importance of the design or refurbishment on office conditions. The study also attempted to determine the factors affecting the occupants' satisfaction with their building or office conditions. Post-occupancy evaluations were conducted using a structured questionnaire developed by the Built Environment Research Group at the University of Manchester, UK. Our questionnaires incorporate 22 factors relating to the internal environment and rate these in terms of "user satisfaction" and "degree of importance." The questions were modified to reflect the specific setting of the study and take into consideration the local conditions and climate in Malaysia. The overall mean satisfaction of the occupants toward their office environment was 5.35. The results were measured by a single item of overall liking of office conditions in general. Occupants were more satisfied with their state of health in the workplace, but they were extremely dissatisfied with the distance away from a window. The factor analysis divided the variables into three groups, namely intrusion, air quality, and office appearance. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was then used to determine which factor had the most significant influence on occupants' satisfaction: appearance. The findings from the study suggest that continuous improvement in aspects of the building's appearance needs to be supported with effective and comprehensive maintenance to sustain the occupants' satisfaction.
  2. Abd Wahab M, Eddie EA, Ibrahim Ahmad UQA, Shafie H, Shaikh Abd Karim SB, Abdull Wahab SF
    J Ultrasound, 2022 Jan 15.
    PMID: 35032294 DOI: 10.1007/s40477-021-00609-4
    PURPOSE: The portability of a hand-held ultrasound allows the health care worker to conduct lung ultrasound in out-of-hospital setting. It is used as a tool to conduct staging and triaging for COVID-19 patients. This study evaluated the utilization of lung ultrasound in an out-of-hospital setting versus chest x-rays in detecting and staging of COVID-19 patients with pneumonia.

    METHODS: The study was conducted among COVID-19 subjects at an out-of-hospital setting whereby lung ultrasound was done and subsequently chest x-rays were taken after being admitted to the health care facilities. Lung ultrasound findings were reviewed by emergency physicians, while the chest x-rays were reviewed by radiologists. Radiologists were blinded by the patients' lung ultrasound findings and clinical conditions. The analysis of the agreement between the lung ultrasound findings and chest x-rays was conducted.

    RESULTS: A total of 261 subjects were recruited. LUS detected pulmonary infiltrative changes in more stage 3 COVID-19 subjects in comparison to chest x-rays. Multiple B-lines were the predominant findings at the right lower anterior, posterior and lateral zones. Interstitial consolidations and ground glass opacities were the predominant descriptive findings in chest x-rays. However, there was no agreement between lung ultrasound and chest x-ray findings in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia as the Cohen's Kappa coefficient was 0.08 (95% CI 0.06-0.22, p = 0.16).

    CONCLUSION: The diagnostic imaging and staging of COVID-19 patients using lung ultrasound in out-of-hospital settings showed LUS detected lung pleural disease more often than CXR for stage 3 COVID-19 patients.

  3. Abd Karim SB, Norman S, Koting S, Simarani K, Loo SC, Mohd Rahim FA, et al.
    Materials (Basel), 2023 Aug 08;16(16).
    PMID: 37629806 DOI: 10.3390/ma16165515
    The rapid economic and industrial growth experienced in the Asian region has significantly increased waste production, particularly single-use plastic. This surge in waste poses a significant challenge for these countries' municipal solid waste management systems. Consequently, there is a pressing need for progressive and effective solutions to address the plastic waste issue. One promising initiative involves utilizing used plastic to produce components for asphalt pavement. The concept of plastic road technology has gained traction in Asia, with 32 countries displaying varying levels of interest, ranging from small-scale laboratory experiments to large-scale construction projects. However, as a relatively new technology, plastic road implementation requires continuous and comprehensive environmental and health risk assessments to ascertain its viability as a reliable green technology. This review paper presents the current findings and potential implementation of plastic-modified asphalt in Asian countries, with particular attention given to its environmental and human health impacts. While plastic asphalt roads hold promise in waste reduction, improved asphalt properties, and cost savings, it is imperative to thoroughly consider the environmental and health impacts, quality control measures, recycling limitations, and long-term performance of this road construction material. Further research and evaluation are needed to fully understand the viability and sustainability of plastic asphalt roads. This will enable a comprehensive assessment of its potential benefits and drawbacks, aiding in developing robust guidelines and standards for its implementation. By addressing these considerations, it will be possible to optimize the utilization of plastic waste in road construction and contribute to a greener and more sustainable future.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links