Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Jin QW, Mohd Ghazi AB, Kolanthaivelu J, Azmi Yahaya S
    AsiaIntervention, 2022 Oct;8(2):138-142.
    PMID: 36483273 DOI: 10.4244/AIJ-D-21-00037
    BACKGROUND: Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention has recently emerged as a viable alternative to surgery for patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Though usually performed on the basis of compassionate grounds, we are now exploring the extension of its usage as an elective option in a patient with severe atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation.

    AIMS: The aim of this study was to select a suitable patient and proceed with the implantation of the TricValve in order to provide symptomatic relief as well as to improve morbidity and mortality.

    METHODS: A 67-year-old woman had underlying atrial fibrillation and severe tricuspid regurgitation. Despite optimised medical therapy, she remained symptomatic with elevated NT-proBNP levels. As the patient refused surgery on multiple occasions, we chose a percutaneous procedure guided by transoesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy.

    RESULTS: The procedure was uneventful and the patient was discharged. At 3-month follow-up, there was marked improvement clinically and biochemically.

    CONCLUSIONS: Bicaval valve implantation with the TricValve is a viable alternative to surgery in patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation. This intervention is crucial as we are now able to intervene before irreversible right ventricular dysfunction sets in.

  2. Yap SH, Ng YP, Roslan A, Kolanthaivelu J, Koh KW, P'ng HS, et al.
    Med J Malaysia, 2017 12;72(6):360-364.
    PMID: 29308774 MyJurnal
    INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with significant morbidity and mortality in relation to thromboembolic stroke. Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dabigatran in stroke prevention in elderly patient with nonvalvular AF with regard to the risk of ischemic stroke and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) in real-world setting.

    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 200 patients on dabigatran and warfarin from January 2009 till September 2016 was carried out. Data were collected for 100 patients on dabigatran and 100 patients on warfarin.

    RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 340.7±322.3 days for dabigatran group and 410.5±321.2 days for warfarin group. The mean time in therapeutic range (TTR) was 52±18.7%. The mean CHA2DS2 -VASc score for dabigatran group was 4.4±1.1 while 5.0±1.5 for warfarin group. None in dabigatran group experienced ischemic stroke compared to one patient in warfarin group (p=0.316). There was one patient in dabigatran group suffered from ICH compared to none in warfarin group (p=0.316). Four patients in warfarin group experienced minor bleeding, while none from dabigatran group (p=0.043).

    CONCLUSION: Overall bleeding events were significantly lower in dabigatran group compared to warfarin group. In the presence of suboptimal TTR rates and inconveniences with warfarin therapy, non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are the preferred agents for stroke prevention in elderly Asian patients for nonvalvular AF.

  3. Roslan A, Tey YS, Ares F, Ashari A, Shaparudin A, Wan Rahimi WF, et al.
    Med J Malaysia, 2022 Nov;77(6):736-743.
    PMID: 36448393
    INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVRs) has become widespread throughout the world. To date, there are no echocardiographic studies of TAVR patients from Southeast Asia (SEA). We sought to evaluate (1) changes in echocardiographic and strain values pre- and post-TAVR (2) relationship between aortic stenosis (AS) severity and strain values, (3) left ventricle geometry in severe AS, (4) relationship of flow rate to dimensionless index (DVI) and acceleration time (AT), and (5) effect of strains on the outcome.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 112 TAVR patients in our centre from 2009 to 2020. The echocardiographic and strain images pre (within 1 month), post (day after), and 6 months post-TAVR were analyzed by expert echocardiographer.

    RESULTS: The ejection fraction (EF) increased at 6 months (53.02 ± 12.12% to 56.35 ± 9.00%) (p=0.044). Interventricular septal thickness in diastole (IVSd) decreased (1.27 ± 0.21 cm to 1.21 ± 0.23 cm) (p=0.038) and left ventricle internal dimension in diastole (LVIDd) decreased from 4.77 ± 0.64 cm to 4.49 ± 0.65 cm (p=0.001). No changes in stroke volume index (SVI pre vs 6 months p=0.187), but the flow rate increases (217.80 ± 57.61 mls/s to 251.94 ± 69.59 mls/s, p<0.001). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) improved from -11.44 ± 4.23% to -13.94 ± 3.72% (p<0.001), left atrial reservoir strain (Lar-S) increased from 17.44 ± 9.16% to 19.60 ± 8.77% (p=0.033). Eight patients (7.5%) had IVSd < 1.0 cm, and 4 patients (3.7%) had normal left ventricle (LV) geometry. There was linear relationship between IVSd and mean PG (r=0.208, p=0.031), between GLS to aortic valve area (AVA) and aortic valve area index (AVAi) (r = - 0.305, p=0.001 and r= - 0.316, p= 0.001). There was also relationship between AT (r=-0.20, p=0.04) and DVI (r=0.35, p<0.001) with flow rate. Patients who died late (after 6 months) had lower GLS at 6 months. (Alive; -13.94 ± 3.72% vs Died; -12.43 ± 4.19%, p=0.001).

    CONCLUSION: At 6 months, TAVR cause reverse remodelling of the LV with the reduction in IVSd, LVIDd, and improvement in GLS and LAr-S. There is a linear relationship between GLS and AVA and between IVSd and AVA.

  4. Roslan A, Soon CK, Sin TY, Aktifanus ATJ, Ling SS, Boon WK, et al.
    J Cardiothorac Surg, 2024 Jan 02;19(1):3.
    PMID: 38167451 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-023-02472-2
    BACKGROUND: This study examined the characteristics and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) both isolated and in combination with other cardiac surgery in Malaysia from 2015 to 2021.

    METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 1346 patients analyzed on the basis of medical records, echocardiograms and surgical reports. The overall sample was both considered as a whole and divided into aortic stenosis (AS)/aortic regurgitation (AR)-predominant and similar-severity subgroups.

    RESULTS: The most common diagnosis was severe AS (34.6%), with the 3 most common etiologies being bicuspid valve degeneration (45.3%), trileaflet valve degeneration (36.3%) and rheumatic valve disease (12.2%). The second most common diagnosis was severe AR (25.5%), with the most common etiologies being root dilatation (21.0%), infective endocarditis (IE) (16.6%) and fused prolapse (12.2%). Rheumatic valve disease was the most common mixed disease. A total of 54.5% had AS-predominant pathology (3 most common etiologies: bicuspid valve degeneration valve, degenerative trileaflet valve and rheumatic valve disease), 36.9% had AR-predominant pathology (top etiologies: root dilatation, rheumatic valve disease and IE), and 8.6% had similar severity of AS and AR. Overall, 62.9% of patients had trileaflet valve morphology, 33.3% bicuspid, 0.6% unicuspid and 0.3% quadricuspid. For AS, the majority were high-gradient severe AS (49.9%), followed by normal-flow low-gradient (LG) severe AS (10.0%), paradoxical low-flow (LF)-LG severe AS (6.4%) and classical LF-LG severe AS (6.1%). The overall in-hospital and total 1-year mortality rates were 6.4% and 14.8%, respectively. Pure severe AS had the highest mortality. For AS-predominant pathology, the etiology with the highest mortality was trileaflet valve degeneration; for AR-predominant pathology, it was dissection. The overall survival probability at 5 years was 79.5% in all patients, 75.7% in the AS-predominant subgroup, 83.3% in the AR-predominant subgroup, and 87.3% in the similar-severity subgroup.

    CONCLUSIONS: The 3 most common causes of AS- predominant patients undergoing SAVR is bicuspid valve degeneration, degenerative trileaflet valve and rheumatic and for AR-predominant is root dilatation, rheumatic and IE. Rheumatic valve disease is an important etiology in our SAVR patients especially in mixed aortic valve disease. Study registration IJNREC/562/2022.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links