Sutures are a type of fibrous joint that occur only in the skull. However, partial or complete division of bones resulting in anomalous or accessory skull sutures may be misinterpreted as fractures when identified on radiological examination. Thus, it is of paramount clinical and medicolegal importance that these sutures be differentiated from actual fractures which can lead to severe consequences such as false accusation and mis-management of patient. It must be remembered though that the diagnosis in such cases is not straight forward even during postmortem examination which requires careful evaluation of findings with the aid of histology examination and radiology imaging. We present a case of a mis-diagnosis of an anomalous parietal suture in a three-month-old infant.
We report a fatal case of a 26-year-old nulliparous woman who presented with an anterior mediastinal mass in her late pregnancy. She had complained of a progressively increasing neck swelling and occasional dry cough in the early second trimester, which was associated with worsening dyspnoea, reduced effort tolerance and orthopnoea. Ultrasound of the neck showed an enlarged lymph node, and chest X-ray revealed mediastinal widening. At 35 weeks' gestation, the patient was referred to a tertiary centre for a computed tomography (CT) scan of the neck and thorax under elective intubation via awake fibreoptic nasal intubation as she was unable to lie flat. However, she developed sudden bradycardia, hypotension and desaturation soon after being positioned supine, which required resuscitation. She succumbed after 3 days in the intensive care unit. An autopsy revealed a large anterior mediastinal mass extending to the right supraclavicular region, displacing the heart and lungs, encircling the superior vena cava and right internal jugular vein with tumour thrombus extending into the right atrium. Histopathology examination of the mediastinal mass confirmed the diagnosis of a primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. This report emphasizes the severe and fatal outcome resulting from the delay and misinterpretation of symptoms related to a mediastinal mass.
During a disease pandemic, there is still a requirement to perform postmortem examinations within the context of legal considerations. The management of the dead from COVID-19 should not impede the medicolegal investigation of the death where required by the authorities and legislation but additional health and safety precautions should be adopted for the necessary postmortem procedures. The authors have therefore used the craniotomy box in an innovative way to enable a safe alternative for skull and brain removal procedures on suspected or confirmed COVID-19 bodies. The craniotomy box technique was tested on a confirmed COVID-19 positive body where a full postmortem examination was performed by a team of highly trained personnel in a negative pressure Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) autopsy suite in the National Institute of Forensic Medicine (IPFN) Malaysia. This craniotomy box is a custom-made transparent plastic box with five walls but without a floor. Two circular holes were made in one wall for the placement of arms in order to perform the skull opening procedure. A swab to detect the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was taken from the interior surface of the craniotomy box after the procedure. The result from the test using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) proved that an additional barrier provided respiratory protection by containing the aerosols generated from the skull opening procedure. This innovation ensures procedures performed inside this craniotomy box are safe for postmortem personnel performing high risk autopsies during pandemics.