METHODS: A structured questionnaire was mailed in 2008, 2011 and 2014 to senior medical physicists representing 23 countries. The questionnaire covers 7 themes: education and training including certification; staffing; typical tasks; professional organisations; resources; research and teaching; job satisfaction.
RESULTS: Across all surveys the response rate was >85% with the replies representing practice affecting more than half of the world's population. The expectation of ROMP qualifications (MSc and between 1 and 3years of clinical experience) has not changed much over the years. However, compared to 2008, the number of medical physicists in many countries has doubled. Formal professional certification is only available in a small number of countries. The number of experienced ROMPs is small in particular in low and middle income countries. The increase in staff numbers from 2008 to 2014 is matched by a similar increase in the number of treatment units which is accompanied by an increase in treatment complexity. Many ROMPs are required to work overtime and not many find time for research. Resource availability has only improved marginally and ROMPs still feel generally overworked, but professional recognition, while varying widely, appears to be improving slowly.
CONCLUSION: While number of physicists and complexity of treatment techniques and technologies have increased significantly, ROMP practice remains essentially unchanged over the last 6years in the Asia Pacific Region.
METHODS: A network of ICRP mentees from 23 countries were surveyed for available dosimetry equipment. Standardised measurements on CBCT linac imaging systems were conducted using a cone beam dose index (CBDI) devised as a straightforward measurement for wide beam doses. Measurements were made with (a) 100 mm ionisation chambers or (b) 0.6 cc Farmer ionisation chambers and cylindrical CT PMMA phantoms, and (c) an alternative setup of Farmer chambers and cubical phantoms comprised of slabs of water equivalent material readily available in radiotherapy centres. The measurements were compared with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.
RESULTS: The survey showed limited availability for the reference setup using 100 mm chambers and CT phantoms. Correction factors were derived to convert normalised CBDI from alternative setups to the reference setup and are on average within 2% of MC simulations.
CONCLUSION: The slab phantom in combination with a Farmer chamber provides an alternative to quantify CBCT radiation dose indices from linac-based image-guided radiotherapy using materials accessible in most centres worldwide. A method is presented to use correction factors for Varian Truebeam linacs if traditional 100 mm chambers and cylindrical CT phantoms are not available. This will enable most radiotherapy centres across the world to engage in meaningful imaging dose measurement and optimisation.