Affiliations 

  • 1 Dept. of Clinical Physics and Bio-Engineering, University of Glasgow, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow G12 0XH, UK; Task Group 116 member, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada. Electronic address: colin.j.martin@ntlworld.com
  • 2 Dept. of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Task Group 116 member, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
  • 3 International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria; Task Group 116 member, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
  • 4 Medical Physics Service, Queen's Centre, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Castle Road, Hull HU16 5JQ, UK; Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK; Task Group 116 member, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
  • 5 Dept. of Health Informatics and Data Science, Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University, Chicago, IL, USA
  • 6 Clinical Oncology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Task Group 116 member, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
  • 7 Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, IL 60153 USA; Task Group 116 member, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
  • 8 Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, IL 60153 USA; Mentorship programme, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
  • 9 Dept. of Medical Physics, German Oncology Center, Limassol 4108, Cyprus; Mentorship programme, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
  • 10 Physics Dept., Sciences Faculty, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Cancer Institut "Carlos Ardila Lülle", Santa Fe Foundation, Bogota, Colombia; Mentorship programme, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
  • 11 Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, University of El-Oued, PO Box 789, El-Oued, Algeria; Mentorship programme, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
  • 12 Dept. of Medical Technology and Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia; Mentorship programme, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
  • 13 Baheya Center for Early Detection & Breast Cancer Treatment, 4 Aloba St. of Haram St. Dari Center, Giza, Egypt; Mentorship programme, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
  • 14 The National Center for Applied Physics, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), P.O. Box: 6086, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Mentorship programme, International Commission on Radiological Protection, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9, Canada
Phys Med, 2021 Oct;90:53-65.
PMID: 34562809 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.09.004

Abstract

Improvements in delivery of radiation dose to target tissues in radiotherapy have increased the need for better image quality and led to a higher frequency of imaging patients. Imaging for treatment planning extends to function and motion assessment and devices are incorporated into medical linear accelerators (linacs) so that regions of tissue can be imaged at time of treatment delivery to ensure dose distributions are delivered as accurately as possible. A survey of imaging in 97 radiotherapy centres in nine countries on six continents has been undertaken with an on-line questionnaire administered through the International Commission on Radiological Protection mentorship programme to provide a snapshot of imaging practices. Responses show that all centres use CT for planning treatments and many utilise additional information from magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography scans. Most centres have kV cone beam CT attached to at least some linacs and use this for the majority of treatment fractions. The imaging options available declined with the human development index (HDI) of the country, and the frequency of imaging during treatment depended more on country than treatment site with countries having lower HDIs imaging less frequently. The country with the lowest HDI had few kV imaging facilities and relied on MV planar imaging intermittently during treatment. Imaging protocols supplied by vendors are used in most centres and under half adapt exposure conditions to individual patients. Recording of patient doses, a knowledge of which is important in optimisation of imaging protocols, was limited primarily to European countries.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications