Affiliations 

  • 1 Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.dodkins@nhs.net
  • 2 Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
  • 3 Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Belgium
  • 4 University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
  • 5 Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India
  • 6 American University of Beirut, Lebanon
  • 7 King's College, London, United Kingdom
  • 8 University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa
  • 9 Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College, London, United Kingdom; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
PMID: 35151802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.053

Abstract

PURPOSE: Randomized control trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone of delivering sustained improvements in cancer outcome. To inform radiotherapy research policy and prioritization, we analyze the radiotherapy RCT landscape including comparison with trials of systemic therapies over the same time period, with a specific focus on funding and disparities across income settings.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective cohort study identified all phase three RCTs evaluating anticancer therapies published from 2014 to 2017. RCTs were classified according to anticancer modality and country of origin. Descriptive statistics were used to compare key characteristics of radiotherapy RCT studies according to study design characteristics, tumor types evaluated, types of intervention appraised, treatment intent and main funding sources.

RESULTS: The study cohort included 694 RCTs of which 64 were radiotherapy RCTs (9%) compared to 601 (87%) systemic therapy RCTs. 47% of all radiotherapy RCTs focused on two areas of evaluation; combining radiotherapy with systemic agents (25%) and changes in dose fractionation (22%). The most common cancers studied were head and neck (22%), lung (22%) and breast (14%) with cervical cancer trials only representing 3% of the cohort. 33% of radiotherapy RCTs met their primary end point. 62% of radiotherapy RCTs assessed interventions in the curative setting compared to 31% in systemic therapy RCTs. 77% of the radiotherapy RCTs were performed in high-income countries (HIC), 13% in low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC) and 11% in both HIC and LMICs. 17% of radiotherapy RCTs received funding from industry compared to 79% of systemic therapy RCTs.

CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted the need for greater investment in radiotherapy RCTs and the disparities in conduct of RCTs globally. The study emphases the urgent need for more capacity building for cancer clinical trials in LMICs and more sustainable funding sources.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.