MyMedR

Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Is Clinical Research Serving the Needs of the Global Cancer Burden? An analysis of contemporary global radiotherapy randomised controlled trials

Dodkins J, Hopman WM, Wells JC, Lievens Y, Malik RA, Pramesh CS, et al.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2022 Feb 10.
PMID: 35151802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.053

PURPOSE: Randomized control trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone of delivering sustained improvements in cancer outcome. To inform radiotherapy research policy and prioritization, we analyze the radiotherapy RCT landscape including comparison with trials of systemic therapies over the same time period, with a specific focus on funding and disparities across income settings.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective cohort study identified all phase three RCTs evaluating anticancer therapies published from 2014 to 2017. RCTs were classified according to anticancer modality and country of origin. Descriptive statistics were used to compare key characteristics of radiotherapy RCT studies according to study design characteristics, tumor types evaluated, types of intervention appraised, treatment intent and main funding sources.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 694 RCTs of which 64 were radiotherapy RCTs (9%) compared to 601 (87%) systemic therapy RCTs. 47% of all radiotherapy RCTs focused on two areas of evaluation; combining radiotherapy with systemic agents (25%) and changes in dose fractionation (22%). The most common cancers studied were head and neck (22%), lung (22%) and breast (14%) with cervical cancer trials only representing 3% of the cohort. 33% of radiotherapy RCTs met their primary end point. 62% of radiotherapy RCTs assessed interventions in the curative setting compared to 31% in systemic therapy RCTs. 77% of the radiotherapy RCTs were performed in high-income countries (HIC), 13% in low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC) and 11% in both HIC and LMICs. 17% of radiotherapy RCTs received funding from industry compared to 79% of systemic therapy RCTs.
CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted the need for greater investment in radiotherapy RCTs and the disparities in conduct of RCTs globally. The study emphases the urgent need for more capacity building for cancer clinical trials in LMICs and more sustainable funding sources.
Fulltext Cancer and COVID-19 vaccines: a complex global picture

Yusuf A, Sarfati D, Booth CM, Pramesh CS, Lombe D, Aggarwal A, et al.

Lancet Oncol, 2021 06;22(6):749-751.
PMID: 33930324 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00244-8
Fulltext Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Researchers in 2020: A Qualitative Study of Events to Inform Mitigation Strategies

Fox L, Beyer K, Rammant E, Morcom E, Van Hemelrijck M, Sullivan R, et al.

Front Public Health, 2021;9:741223.
PMID: 34966713 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.741223

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on global health systems and economies. With ongoing and future challenges posed to the field due to the pandemic, re-examining research priorities has emerged as a concern. As part of a wider project aiming to examine research priorities, here we aimed to qualitatively examine the documented impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer researchers. Materials and Methods: We conducted a literature review with the aim of identifying non-peer-reviewed journalistic sources and institutional blog posts which qualitatively documented the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer researchers. We searched on 12th January 2021 using the LexisNexis database and Google, using terms and filters to identify English-language media reports and blogs, containing references to both COVID-19 and cancer research. The targeted search returned 751 results, of which 215 articles met the inclusion criteria. These 215 articles were subjected to a conventional qualitative content analysis, to document the impacts of the pandemic on the field of cancer research. Results: Our analysis yielded a high plurality of qualitatively documented impacts, from which seven categories of direct impacts emerged: (1) COVID measures halting cancer research activity entirely; (2) COVID measures limiting cancer research activity; (3) forced adaptation of research protocols; (4) impacts on cancer diagnosis, cases, and services; (5) availability of resources for cancer research; (6) disruption to the private sector; and (7) disruption to supply chains. Three categories of consequences from these impacts also emerged: (1) potential changes to future research practice; (2) delays to the progression of the field; and (3) potential new areas of research interest. Discussion: The COVID-19 pandemic had extensive practical and economic effects on the field of cancer research in 2020 that were highly plural in nature. Appraisal of cancer research strategies in a post-COVID world should acknowledge the potential for substantial limitations (such as on financial resources, limited access to patients for research, decreased patient access to cancer care, staffing issues, administrative delays, or supply chain issues), exacerbated cancer disparities, advances in digital health, and new areas of research related to the intersection of cancer and COVID-19.
Fulltext Priorities for cancer research in low- and middle-income countries: a global perspective

Pramesh CS, Badwe RA, Bhoo-Pathy N, Booth CM, Chinnaswamy G, Dare AJ, et al.

Nat Med, 2022 Apr;28(4):649-657.
PMID: 35440716 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01738-x

Cancer research currently is heavily skewed toward high-income countries (HICs), with little research conducted in, and relevant to, the problems of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This regional discordance in cancer knowledge generation and application needs to be rebalanced. Several gaps in the research enterprise of LMICs need to be addressed to promote regionally relevant research, and radical rethinking is needed to address the burning issues in cancer care in these regions. We identified five top priorities in cancer research in LMICs based on current and projected needs: reducing the burden of patients with advanced disease; improving access and affordability, and outcomes of cancer treatment; value-based care and health economics; quality improvement and implementation research; and leveraging technology to improve cancer control. LMICs have an excellent opportunity to address important questions in cancer research that could impact cancer control globally. Success will require collaboration and commitment from governments, policy makers, funding agencies, health care organizations and leaders, researchers and the public.