METHODS: This is a retrospective observational case series of patients under 18 years old who fulfilled the WHO COVID-19 case definition and were referred to our paediatric neurology unit at Hospital Tunku Azizah Kuala Lumpur. Their demographic data, neurological symptoms, laboratory and supporting investigations, neuroimaging, treatment and outcomes were collected and analysed.
RESULTS: There were eleven patients with neurological manifestations who fulfilled the WHO COVID-19 case definition. Nine patients presented with seizures and/or encephalopathy, one patient with eye opsoclonus and another patient with persistent limbs myokymia. Based on the history, clinical, electrophysiological and radiological findings, two of them had febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome, two had acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, two had acute necrotising encephalopathy of childhood, one each had hemiconvulsion-hemiplegia-epilepsy syndrome, acute encephalopathy with bilateral striatal necrosis, hemi-acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and reduced diffusion, infection-associated opsoclonus and myokymia.
CONCLUSIONS: This case series highlighted a wide spectrum of neurological manifestations of COVID-19 infection. Early recognition and prompt investigations are important to provide appropriate interventions. It is essential that these investigations should take place in a timely fashion and COVID-19 quarantine period should not hinder the confirmation of various presenting clinical syndromes.
METHODS: This multinational retrospective study enrolled patients who received Atezo-Bev as first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC and reached complete response (CR) or PR. Patients were categorized into three cohorts: patients who underwent curative LRT after PR, patients with PR but did not receive curative LRT, and patients achieving CR without LRT. Curative LRT included surgery, ablation, and definitive radiotherapy with imaging evidence showing disease-free status afterward.
RESULTS: A total of 243 patients were enrolled from 8 countries or regions; 31 patients received curative LRT after PR, 180 patients obtained PR but did not receive curative LRT, and 32 patients achieved CR without LRT. The curative-LRT group, compared with patients who did not receive curative LRT after PR, exhibited significantly longer PFS (median, 44.4 months vs. 18.2 months, p = 0.004) and overall survival (OS) (median, not reached vs. 34.3 months, p < 0.001). The differences remained significant after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment. By contrast, whether before or after IPTW adjustment, the curative-LRT group did not exhibit statistically significant difference in PFS, OS, and recurrence-free survival from patients who obtained CR without curative LRT.
CONCLUSION: Curative LRT may consolidate the efficacy of Atezo-Bev in patients achieving a PR, potentially prolonging survival compared to systemic therapy alone.