METHODS: Mangosteen peel extract was formulated into amorphous solid dispersions using polyvinylpyrrolidone K30 at a 1:3 polymer ratio via solvent evaporation and fluidized bed drying methods. Solubility enhancement was evaluated under standardized conditions, and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was assessed through IC50 determination. Comparative analysis against acarbose and quercetin standards was performed.
RESULTS: Solvent evaporation achieved 2.1-fold solubility enhancement, while fluidized bed drying yielded 1.8-fold improvement. The mangosteen peel extract demonstrated superior α-glucosidase inhibition (IC50 = 20.13 ± 0.02 μg/mL) compared to acarbose (IC50 = 379.75 ± 0.57 μg/mL) but remained less potent than quercetin (IC50 = 2.97 ± 0.05 μg/mL). When normalized to equivalent α- mangostin concentrations, fluidized bed drying preserved inhibitory activity more effectively (IC50 = 112.87 ± 0.06 μg/mL) than solvent evaporation (IC50 = 1238.48 ± 0.51 μg/mL).
DISCUSSION: The manufacturing method significantly influenced both solubility and biological activity. Solvent evaporation maximized solubility enhancement but compromised enzyme inhibitory potency, whereas fluidized bed drying maintained superior inhibitory activity despite moderate solubility improvement. This trade-off suggests that formulation strategy selection should prioritize the desired therapeutic outcome.
CONCLUSION: Amorphous solid dispersion successfully enhanced both solubility and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of mangosteen peel extract. Fluidized bed drying represents the optimal manufacturing approach for preserving enzyme inhibition while achieving meaningful solubility enhancement, positioning α-mangostin as a promising candidate for natural antidiabetic drug development.
METHOD: This research commenced with retrieving protein structures from the RCSB database, generating the formation of ligands using the ChemDraw Professional software, conducting molecular docking with the Autodock Vina software, and performing molecular dynamics simulations using the Amber software, along with the evaluation of RMSD values and intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Free energy, electrostatic interactions, and Van der Waals interaction were calculated using MM/GBSA. Acarbose, used as a positive control, and maltose are simulated together with test compound that has the best free energy. The forcefields used for molecular dynamics simulations are ff19SB, gaff2, and tip3p.
METHODS: Docking between ligand and FOXO1 receptor was carried out with Autodock4.2. For molecular dynamics simulations, the force fields of DNA.OL15, protein.ff14SB, gaff2, and tip3p were used.