MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted on Web of Science, PubMed, and IEEE Xplore for relevant studies published from January 2015 to February 2024. The study was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (protocol no. CRD42024485371). The quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS2) tool and the Must AI Criteria-10 (MAIC-10) checklist were used to assess quality and risk of bias. The meta-analysis included studies reporting DL for breast cancer diagnosis and their performance, from which pooled summary estimates for the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.

RESULTS: A total of 40 studies were included, of which only 21 were eligible for quantitative analysis. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were used in 62.5% (25/40) of the implemented models, with the remaining 37.5% (15/40) hybrid composite models (HCMs). The pooled estimates of AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.93), 88% (95% CI: 86, 91%), and 90% (95% CI: 87, 93%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: DL models used for breast cancer diagnosis on MRI achieve high performance. However, there is considerable inherent variability in this analysis. Therefore, continuous evaluation and refinement of DL models is essential to ensure their practicality in the clinical setting.