PURPOSE: To examine the accuracy of AI-based radiomics in diagnosis, prognosis assessment and predicting the diagnostic value of radiomics for pelvic LN metastasis in cervical cancer patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 118 female patients with 660 LNs and 118 merged LNs. Four imaging histology models-decision tree, random forest, logistic regression, and support vector machine (SVM)-were created in this study. The imaging histology features were extracted from both the independent and merged LN groups. The AUC values for the test sets and the training sets of the four imaging histology models were compared for the independent LN group and the merged LN group. The DeLong test was used to compare the models.
RESULT: The imaging histology prediction model developed in the merged LN group outperformed the independent LN group in terms of test set AUC (0.668 vs. 0.535 for decision tree, 0.841 vs. 0.627 for logistic regression, 0.785 vs. 0.637 for random forest, 0.85 vs. 0.648 for SVM) and accuracy (0.754 vs. 0.676 for decision tree, 0.780 vs. 0.671 for random forest, 0.848 vs. 0.685 for logistic regression, 0.822 vs. 0.657 for SVM).
CONCLUSION: The constructed SVM imaging histology model for the merged LN group might be advantageous in predicting pelvic LN metastasis in cervical cancer.
METHODS: We take advantage of improved contrast seen on magnetic resonance (MR) images of patients with acute and early subacute SICH and introduce an automated algorithm for haematoma and oedema segmentation from these images. To our knowledge, there is no previously proposed segmentation technique for SICH that utilises MR images directly. The method is based on shape and intensity analysis for haematoma segmentation and voxel-wise dynamic thresholding of hyper-intensities for oedema segmentation.
RESULTS: Using Dice scores to measure segmentation overlaps between labellings yielded by the proposed algorithm and five different expert raters on 18 patients, we observe that our technique achieves overlap scores that are very similar to those obtained by pairwise expert rater comparison. A further comparison between the proposed method and a state-of-the-art Deep Learning segmentation on a separate set of 32 manually annotated subjects confirms the proposed method can achieve comparable results with very mild computational burden and in a completely training-free and unsupervised way.
CONCLUSION: Our technique can be a computationally light and effective way to automatically delineate haematoma and oedema extent directly from MR images. Thus, with increasing use of MR images clinically after intracerebral haemorrhage this technique has the potential to inform clinical practice in the future.