Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Pai S, Bhat V, Patil V, Naik N, Awasthi S, Nayak N
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2020 06 15;10(3):279-285.
    PMID: 32802773 DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_75_20
    Aim: Adhesive restoration does not depend primarily on the configuration of the shape of the cavity. Under varying loading conditions, it is essential to know the stress concentration and load transfer mechanism for distinct cavity shapes. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the biomechanical characteristics of various cavity shapes, namely oval, elliptical, trapezoidal, and rectangular shapes of class V cavities on mandibular premolars restored with amalgam, glass ionomer cement, and Cention N using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis.

    Materials and Methods: A 3D prototype of a mandibular premolar was generated by Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images obtained from the cone beam computed tomography and imported to 3D modeling software tool, SpaceClaim. The four distinct load magnitudes of 100, 150, 200, and 250N were applied as a pressure load perpendicular to the lingual plane of the lingual cusp of the occlusal surface (normal load) and at 45° to same (oblique load). The stress distribution patterns and the maximum von Mises stresses were analyzed and compared.

    Results: The occlusal stresses were distributed from the force loading point in an approximate actinomorphic pattern, and when the force load was close to the margin, the stress was much greater.

    Conclusion: Ovoid cavity showed lesser stress concentration and deformation for each of the tested restorative material.

  2. Bhat R, Singh VK, Naik N, Kamath CR, Mulimani P, Kulkarni N
    Asian J Psychiatr, 2020 Apr;50:102047.
    PMID: 32251853 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102047
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links