RESULTS: The mean ±standard deviation contact angles of the microwave-polymerized material were (62.40 ±1.21 degrees) advancing contact angle, (32.12 ±0.66 degrees) receding contact angle, and (30.28 ±1.40 degrees) contact angle of hysteresis. It was followed by the injection-molded nylon polyamide material, whose mean ±standard deviation contact angle values were (68.57 ±1.72 degrees) advancing contact angle, (43.02 ±1.39 degrees) receding contact angle, (26.27 ±2.05 degrees) contact angle hysteresis and high impact strength heat-polymerized polymethylmethacrylate material, whose mean ±standard deviation contact angle values were (69.81 ±0.16 degrees) advancing contact angle, (41.90 ±1.02 degrees) receding contact angle, and (27.91 ±0.97 degrees) contact angle hysteresis. The statistical analysis showed significant differences among contact angle values of the microwave-polymerized material as compared with the heat-polymerized polymethylmethacrylate and injection-molded nylon polyamide materials (P

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this within-subject crossover randomized clinical trial, total 20 edentulous patients were given conventional complete dentures for 3 months to use. All completed a satisfaction questionnaire before implant placement. They were randomly assigned to receive an overdenture retained by either ball or bar attachment. After 3 months satisfaction questionnaires were repeated, and crossover was done by changing the attachments. After use of 3 months of alternate attachments, patients were asked to complete the final questionnaires and asked to choose their preferred type. The patient satisfaction scores were recorded after using 3 months of conventional complete denture, 3 months of first attachment and 3 months of second attachment. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The P values were adjusted using Bonferroni multiple testing correction, and P