Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Prosthodontics, VSPM Dental College and Research Centre, Nagpur, India
  • 2 Private Practice, Mumbai, India
  • 3 Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Jalan Jalil Perkasa- 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2022 Dec;21(4):1175-1179.
PMID: 36896084 DOI: 10.1007/s12663-022-01727-0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Considering the two-implant-retained overdenture as a first treatment of choice for edentulous mandible, patients using the overdentures need to be satisfied with the type of attachment used. The purpose of this study was to determine level of patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures opposing conventional maxillary complete denture using ball-socket and bar-clip attachments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this within-subject crossover randomized clinical trial, total 20 edentulous patients were given conventional complete dentures for 3 months to use. All completed a satisfaction questionnaire before implant placement. They were randomly assigned to receive an overdenture retained by either ball or bar attachment. After 3 months satisfaction questionnaires were repeated, and crossover was done by changing the attachments. After use of 3 months of alternate attachments, patients were asked to complete the final questionnaires and asked to choose their preferred type. The patient satisfaction scores were recorded after using 3 months of conventional complete denture, 3 months of first attachment and 3 months of second attachment. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The P values were adjusted using Bonferroni multiple testing correction, and P 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications