MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Study used a pre-experimental design method with a One-Group Pre-Post test design approach. We recruited 60 breastfeeding mothers in Padang, Indonesia, selected with consecutive sampling. Online Education Based On Family Centered Maternity Care was provided for the respondent. Data were collected using the Breastfeeding Self efficacy Scale ShortForm (BSE-SF) and The Breastfeeding Knowledge (BKQ) Questionnaires.
RESULTS: The respondents had significant differences in selfefficacy and knowledge before and after the health education Based On Family Centered Maternity Care (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: After Education Package Based On Family Centered Maternity Care influenced the Self Efficacy And Knowledge of Breastfeeding Mothers. It could be provided as a nursing intervention to assist Breastfeeding Mothers.
METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional surveillance data from 394 children in Pesisir Selatan District, West Sumatra, Indonesia, and classified nutritional status according to the 2006 World Health Organization Child Growth Standards. For each outcome, we fitted a parsimonious logistic model (LBW, age, maternal education, and sex) and an expanded model incorporating 8 additional variables (9 regression coefficients). We assessed discrimination using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration slope.
RESULTS: The prevalence of stunting, wasting, and underweight was 14.5%, 10.7%, and 17.3%, respectively. LBW was the strongest predictor in the parsimonious model for stunting (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.53-9.29), wasting (AOR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.38-6.02), and underweight (AOR, 4.34; 95% CI, 2.30-8.19; p≤.005). A lack of formal maternal education was independently associated with stunting and underweight. The optimism-corrected AUROCs were .706, .631, and .751, with calibration slopes of .88, .75, and .90, respectively. Adding variables in the expanded model did not improve fit (likelihood-ratio p>.05) and increased optimism.
CONCLUSION: The parsimonious model showed modest discrimination for stunting and underweight. Discrimination for wasting was inadequate. A predictive contribution from the added variables could not be demonstrated with the available number of events. These preliminary findings require external validation before community-level application.