Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Sha HL, Roslani AC, Poh KS
    Colorectal Dis, 2020 10;22(10):1379-1387.
    PMID: 32337794 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15091
    AIM: The Sodergren score was developed to objectively measure the severity of haemorrhoidal symptoms. This study aimed to determine if there was a difference in the Sodergren score between patients who were offered surgery and patients who underwent successful rubber band ligation of internal haemorrhoidal disease and to assess its performance in guiding management.

    METHOD: This is a prospective, observational study. The preintervention Sodergren scores of subjects with internal haemorrhoidal disease were recorded and blinded to the surgeon in charge. Sodergren scores of subjects in the two arms were unblinded and compared at the end of the study.

    RESULTS: The results for 290 patients were available for final analysis. The median scores of those offered surgery and those who underwent successful rubber band ligation differed significantly [4 (interquartile range 3-10) vs 0 (interquartile range 0-4), P = 0.001]. In predicting treatment, the Sodergren score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.735 (95% CI 0.675-0.795).

    CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference in scores between patients who were offered surgery and patients with successful rubber band ligation. Our study suggests that the Sodergren score has an acceptable discrimination in predicting the need for surgery in internal haemorrhoidal disease. We propose that patients with a Sodergren score of 6 or more be considered for upfront surgery. This score could potentially be used to standardize outcomes of future haemorrhoid trials.

  2. Yu L, Sha H, Ji P, See KF
    J Environ Manage, 2025 Mar 05;379:124783.
    PMID: 40049012 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124783
    Unlike command-based, market-based, and voluntary-based environmental regulations, credit-based environmental regulation leverages social credit to foster sustainable development. Drawing on panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies spanning 2010 to 2022, this study employs a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) approach to examine how credit-based environmental regulation influences enterprise total factor productivity (TFP), leveraging the implementation of China's Environmental Credit Evaluation Policy (ECEP) as a quasi-natural experiment. The findings indicate that the ECEP significantly enhances enterprise TFP. Mechanism analysis reveals that the ECEP enhances enterprise TFP by optimizing capital allocation efficiency and stimulating green technology innovation. Cross-sectional analysis demonstrates that the ECEP's TFP enhancement effect is more pronounced in regions with rigorous environmental enforcement and superior green credit, in industries with intense market competition, and among firms with weak internal controls. Overall, this study underscores the significance of credit-based environmental regulation in advancing green development.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links