Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Kumaravadivel Dharmalingam, T., Mohammad Rahim Kamaluddin, Shamsul Kamalrujan Hassan, Rhendra Hardy Mohammad Zaini
    MyJurnal
    The needs of intensive care patient’s family
    members are often neglected. Many healthcare practitioners do
    not realize that meeting the family needs in the intensive care
    settings actually may improve outcome for their patients and
    enable the family members to cope and deal with the patient’s
    hospitalization period effectively. With this in mind, the present
    study aimed to address the needs of Malaysian family members
    of intensive care unit patients. Methods: This cross-sectional
    survey was conducted among family members of Intensive Care
    Unit of Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. A total of
    60 family members were recruited using a convenience sampling
    manner. A Malay validated Critical Care Family Needs
    Inventory was used to identify the family needs among the
    respondents. Descriptive statistics as well as mean comparison
    analyses were employed to achieve the study. Results: The
    findings showed that family members ranked Assurance items as
    the most important needs. In terms of subscales scores,
    Assurance and Information evidenced higher mean scores
    compared to other dimensions. All the family need dimensions
    had positive and significant associations with one another. The
    highest correlation was noted among Comfort – Support pair,
    r(58) = 0.73, p < 0.001. No significant differences in the mean
    values found across gender, history of admission and types of
    relationships. In contrast, significant mean difference was
    observed across level of education. Conclusion: Identifying the
    needs of family members in the intensive care unit is imperative
    as it raises awareness and contributes knowledge in terms of
    family needs to healthcare providers, policy makers, medical
    social workers and general public.
  2. Mohd Zulfakar Mazlan, Shamsul Kamalrujan Hassan, Laila Abd Mukmin, Mohd Hasyizan Hassan, Huda Zainal Abiddin, Irfan Mohamad, et al.
    MyJurnal
    Giant haemangioma of the tongue is a disease which can
    obstruct the oropharyngeal airway and is presented with
    obstructive symptoms. Due to its vascularity, inserting
    laryngoscope for intubation can cause high risks, such as
    inducing bleeding. Hypoxia and excessive bleeding must be
    anticipated while securing the airway. We present a case of
    novel usage of dexmedetomidine as a conscious sedation agent
    for awake fibre optic intubation in a 9-year-old child with
    obstructive symptoms secondary to a huge tongue
    haemangioma, who was presented for interventional
    sclerotherapy of the lesion.
  3. Mohamad Hasyizan Hassan, Eng, Ming Fung, Rhendra Hardy Mohd Zaini, Shamsul Kamalrujan Hassan, Seevaunnamtum, Praveena, Mohd Zulfakar Mazlan, et al.
    MyJurnal
    Background: Existing techniques of predicting difficult laryngoscopy are inadequate requiring evaluation of Maxillopharyngeal Angle (MP-A) on lateral cervical radiograph described. Objectives: This study aimed to compare MP-A test with Modified Mallapati Test (MMT) in predicting their diagnostic values and Area Under Curve of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUCROCC) of both test. Methods: This is a double blinded interventional study of 93 patients. Each patient’s MMT score was assessed during preoperative assessment and subsequent MP-A test done by obtaining lateral cervical radiograph with the head in neutral position. Laryngeal view was assessed using Cormack-Lehane grade after induction of anesthesia, was used as reference standard to determine the diagnostic values of MMT and MP-A respectively. Results: The MP-A compared to MMT in predicting difficult larngoscopy had higher sensitivity (77.78 vs 44.44) specificity (88.10 vs 67.86) and accuracy (87.10 vs 65.59) with higher Odd Ratio(26.12 vs 1.68). The AUCROCC was significantly higher in MP-A test 0.83(95%CI: 0.67, 0.99) (P = 0.001) vs MMT 0.56(95%CI: 0.36, 0.76) (P = 0.546) with LR+ of 6.53 vs 1.38. Conclusion: The Maxillopharyngeal Angle test was superior in predicting difficult laryngoscopy as compared to Modified Mallampati Test.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links