AIM: To determine the association of the behavior factors in relation to ED and to identify the risk and protective factors.
METHOD: A systematic review search based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis was conducted. The primary databases PubMed, PlosOne, Oxford Academic, SCOPUS, and Ovid were accessed using specific keyword searches. Quality of articles was assessed by using Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale according to the study design.
OUTCOME: Evaluation of the relationship between behavioral factors and ED.
RESULTS: 24 studies were identified from the 5 databases which met the predetermined criteria. Overall, the study population include adult male age between 18 and 80 years. The sample size of the studies ranges from 101 to the largest sample size of 51,329. Smoking, alcohol, and drugs usage are found to be risk factors for ED. Meanwhile, dietary intake, physical activity, and intimacy are the protective factors for ED.
CLINICAL IMPLICATION: The findings from this review may aid clinicians to aim for early detection of ED by screening their risk factors and providing early treatment. This can also be used to promote awareness to the community on the sexual health and factors that can affect their sexual function.
STRENGTH & LIMITATION: This study looks at all types of behavioral factors that may affect ED; however, there was a substantial heterogeneity detected across the selected study factors. Furthermore, the lack of PROSPERO registration is also a limitation in this study.
CONCLUSION: Overall, smoking, dietary intake, alcohol consumption, drugs, and physical activities are modifiable risk factors for ED in men. Therefore, it is crucial to promote healthy lifestyle and empower men to prevent ED and early detection of ED for early treatment. Sivaratnam L, Selimin DS, Abd Ghani SR, et al. Behavior-Related Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Sex Med 2021;18:121-143.
METHODS: All laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases reported to the Petaling District Health Office between 1 February and 26 June 2020 were analysed. Socio-demographic characteristics, symptoms, date of onset, date of exposure, travel history and history of comorbidities were obtained by phone interviews using one of two investigation forms. The descriptive analysis was conducted according to time, place and person.
RESULTS: There were 437 COVID-19 cases, for an incidence rate of 24/100 000 population. Ten (2.3%) deaths and 427 recovered cases were recorded. Of the 437 cases, 35.5% remained asymptomatic and 64.5% were symptomatic. Common symptoms included fever (43.8%), cough (31.6%) and sore throat (16.2%); 67.3% had no comorbidities, 62.5% reported close contact with a confirmed case, and 76.7% were local infections. Transmission occurred in four main groups: religious gatherings (20.4%), corporations (15.1%), health facilities (10.3%) and a wholesale wet market (6.4%). In 31.9% of confirmed cases, an epidemiological link to an asymptomatic case was found.
CONCLUSION: Transmission of the disease by asymptomatic cases should be emphasized to ensure continuous wearing of face masks, hand hygiene and social distancing. Further research should be conducted to better understand the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from asymptomatic cases.