Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Van Kriekinge G, Castellsagué X, Cibula D, Demarteau N
    Vaccine, 2014 Feb 3;32(6):733-9.
    PMID: 24291200 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.049
    Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination offers potential for primary prevention of HPV-related pre-cancers and cancers as demonstrated in clinical trials. Mathematical models have estimated the potential real-life impact of vaccination on the burden of cervical cancer (CC). However, these are restricted to evaluations in a limited number of countries.
  2. Van Kriekinge G, Sohn WY, Aljunid SM, Soon R, Yong CM, Chen J, et al.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2018 Apr 25;19(4):933-940.
    PMID: 29693347
    Purpose: To comparatively evaluate the results of a 2-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme
    with the AS04-adjuvanted HPV16/18 vaccine (AS04-HPV-16/18v) or HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine (4vHPVv), in addition
    to cervical cancer (CC) screening, in Malaysia. Methods: A lifetime Markov model replicating the natural history of
    HPV in 13-year-old girls was adapted to Malaysia to assess the impact of vaccination on pre-cancerous lesions, genital
    warts and CC cases, CC deaths, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs from the perspective of the Malaysian
    Ministry of Health. Vaccine effectiveness was based on efficacy and HPV type distribution. Both vaccines were assumed
    to have equal efficacy against vaccine-type HPV but differed for protection against non-vaccine types. Vaccine price
    parity was used and health and cost outcomes were discounted at 3%/annum. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness
    of the results. Results: The model predicted that AS04-HPV-16/18v would result in 361 fewer CC cases and 115 fewer
    CC deaths than 4vHPVv, whereas 4vHPVv averted 4,241 cases of genital warts over the cohort’s lifetime. Discounted
    total costs showed savings of 18.50 million Malaysian Ringgits and 246 QALYs in favour of AS04-HPV-16/18v. In
    one-way sensitivity analyses, the discount rate was the most influential variable for costs and QALYs, but AS04-HPV-
    16/18v remained dominant throughout. A two-way sensitivity analysis to assess the longevity of cross-protection for both
    vaccines confirmed the base-case. Conclusions: In Malaysia, the use of AS04-HPV-16/18v, in addition to screening,
    was modelled to be dominant over 4vHPVv, with greater estimated CC benefits and lower costs.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links