METHODS: An online-based study was carried out among frontline healthcare workers involved in the care of COVID-19 patients (n = 200). Sociodemographic data form and the Brief Religious Coping scale were used in this study.
RESULTS: There were more female healthcare workers (60.5%) and doctors (69.5% vs. 30.5%). Healthcare workers used more positive religious coping than negative religious coping (median score: 22 vs. 9). Positive religious coping was seen more in females (median score: 23 vs. 21, P = .015). Non-doctors applied positive coping more than doctors (median score: 26 vs. 21, P < .001). There were significant differences in positive religious coping scores across income groups, with the B40 group having the highest score (median score: 24). Post hoc pairwise comparison concluded that the B40 group had significantly higher positive religious coping scores than the M40 group.
CONCLUSION: Positive coping was utilized more among female healthcare workers, nondoctors, and the lowest socio-economic group. As prior literature has shown that positive religious coping is desirable and has superior mental health outcomes, our findings show that more effort should be channeled into enhancing positive religious coping, particularly among male healthcare workers, doctors, and the middle and high socio-economic group.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study subjects including 216 ischemic stroke patients and 203 healthy controls were recruited upon obtaining ethical clearance. SNP genotyping was performed using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assays. Gene expression levels were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction assays. Statistical and genetic analyses were conducted with SPSS version 22.2, PLINK version 1.07 and multifactor dimensionality reduction software.
RESULTS: Study subjects with G allele, CG or GG genotypes of SLC17A3 rs9379800 demonstrated increased risk of ischemic stroke with the odds ratios ranging from 1.76-fold to 3.14-fold (p<0.05). When stratified study subjects according to the ethnicity, SLC17A3 rs9379800 G allele and CG genotype contributed to 2.14- and 2.96-fold of ischemic stroke risk among Malay population significantly, in the multivariate analysis (p<0.05). However, no significant associations were observed for PITX2, NINJ2, TWIST1, Rasip1, and MUT polymorphisms with ischemic stroke risk in the multivariate analysis for the pooled cases and controls as well as when stratified them according to the ethnicity. Lower mRNA expression levels of Rasip1, SLC17A3, MUT and FERD3L were observed among cases (p<0.05). After FDR adjustment, the mRNA level of SLC17A3 remained significantly associated with ischemic stroke among Malay population (q=0.034).
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study suggests that SLC17A3 rs9379800 polymorphism and its gene expression contribute to significant ischemic stroke risk among Malaysian population, particularly the Malay who resided at the Northern Region of the country. Our findings can provide useful information for the future diagnosis, management and treatment of ischemic stroke patients.