METHODS: We utilised systematic random sampling by recruiting every 25th patient registered in our clinic during data collection. Participants answered a self-administered printed questionnaire regarding their smartphone usage and familiarity with QR code scanning at the patients' waiting area. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26.
RESULTS: A total of 323 patients participated (response rate=100%). The participants' median age was 57 years (interquartile range=4l-67). Most participants were women (63.1%). Approximately 90.4% (n=282) used smartphones, with 83.7% (n=261) reporting average or good usage proficiency. More than half (58.0%) accessed medical information via their smartphones, and 67.0% were familiar with QR codes. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that familiarity with QR codes was linked to age of <65 years [adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=4.593, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.351-8.976, P<0.001], tertiary education (AOR=2.385, 95% CI=1.170-4.863, P=0.017), smartphone proficiency (A0R=4.703, 95% CI= 1.624-13.623, P=0.004) and prior smartphone usage to access medical information (AOR=5.472, 95% CI=2.790-10.732, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Since smartphones were accessible to most primary care patients, and more than half of the patients were familiar with QR code scanning, QR code-based quality improvement projects can be used to improve services in our setting.
METHODS: We established PN in a dedicated breast clinic of a Malaysian state-run hospital. We compared diagnostic and treatment timeliness between navigated patients (n = 135) and patients diagnosed in the prior year (n = 148), and described factors associated with timeliness.
RESULTS: Women with PN received timely mammography compared with patients in the prior year (96.4% v 74.4%; P < .001), biopsy (92.5% v 76.1%; P = .003), and communication of news (80.0% v 58.5%; P < .001). PN reduced treatment default rates (4.4% v 11.5%; P = .048). Among navigated patients, late stage at presentation was independently associated with having emotional and language barriers ( P = .01). Finally, the main reason reported for delay, default, or refusal of treatment was the preference for alternative therapy.
CONCLUSION: PN is feasible for addressing barriers to cancer care when integrated with a state-run breast clinic of an LMIC. Its implementation resulted in improved diagnostic timeliness and reduced treatment default. Wider adoption of PN could be a key element of cancer control in LMICs.