Displaying 1 publication

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Tang, Y.C., Peh, X.L., Zakaria, N.N., Radzi, Z.
    Ann Dent, 2016;23(1):1-12.
    MyJurnal
    The study aimed to compare mechanical properties and surface characteristics of initial and working
    aesthetic archwires with their conventional counterparts. High Aesthetic Sentalloy (full rhodium coating
    nickel-titanium; Dentsply GAC) represented the initial aesthetic archwires; and FLI TRU-CHROME
    (labial PTFE-coated stainless steel; RMO) as the working aesthetic archwires; together with their
    conventional counterparts were analysed. A three point bending test was conducted using a universal
    testing machine (AGS-X SERIES, Shimadzu, Japan) to determine the load-deflection characteristics of
    archwires. Surface hardness was evaluated by Vickers microhardness test (HMV-FA, Shimadzu, Japan).
    A 3D Optical Surface Texture Analyzer (ALICONA, InfiniteFocus Real3D, Belgium) and a Field Emission
    Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM, FEI Quanta 250, USA) were used for surface evaluation.
    Results showed that load-deflection characteristics of High Aesthetic Sentalloy archwires did not differ
    from its control, whereas FLI TRU-CHROME archwires exhibited higher loading and unloading forces
    than its counterpart. No statistically significant difference in surface hardness was found between FLI
    TRU-CHROME and its control archwires. The coating surfaces of both aesthetic archwires were rougher
    than the non-coated conventional archwires, with similar roughness between non-coated surface of FLI
    TRU-CHROME archwires and its counterpart. FLI TRU-CHROME archwires showed a distinct coating
    thickness but coating layer is undefined in High Aesthetic Sentalloy archwires. In conclusion, the aesthetic
    rhodium coated nickel titanium archwire has similar mechanical properties as control nickel titanium
    archwire without being adversely affected by the addition of the coating layer. The aesthetic coated PTFE
    stainless steel archwire has higher load response which could be an advantage as rigid wire in working
    stage of orthodontic treatment. Based on their performance, their use could be recommended in cases
    where aesthetic aspect is crucial and where the friction aspect is not critical as their surface roughness
    values increased.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links