Methods: Adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) grade 0-1, ongoing androgen deprivation (serum testosterone <50 ng/dL) with prostate specific antigen (PSA) or radiographic progression were randomized to receive abiraterone acetate (1000 mg, QD) + prednisone (5 mg, BID) or placebo + prednisone (5 mg, BID), until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Primary endpoint was improvements in time to PSA progression (TTPP).
Results: Totally, 313 patients were randomized (abiraterone: n = 157; prednisone: n = 156); and baseline characteristics were balanced. At clinical cut-off (median follow-up time: 3.9 months), 80% patients received treatment (abiraterone: n = 138, prednisone: n = 112). Median time to PSA progression was not reached with abiraterone versus 3.8 months for prednisone, attaining 58% reduction in PSA progression risk (HR = 0.418; p
METHODS: A prospective observational study of PCNL performed at our institution was done. All adults with radio-opaque renal stones planned for PCNL were included except those with coagulopathy, planned for additional procedures. Factors including gender, co-morbidities, body mass index, stone burden, puncture site, tract dilatation size, operative position, surgeon's seniority, and operative duration were studied using stepwise multivariate regression analysis to identify the predictive factors associated with higher estimated hemoglobin (Hb) deficiency.
RESULTS: Overall, 4.86% patients (n=7) received packed cells transfusion. The mean estimated Hb deficiency was 1.3 (range 0-6.5) g/dL and the median was 1.0 g/dL. Stepwise multivariate regression analysis revealed that absence of hypertension (p=0.024), puncture site (p=0.027), and operative duration (p=0.023) were significantly associated with higher estimated Hb deficiency. However, the effect sizes are rather small with partial eta-squared of 0.037, 0.066, and 0.038, respectively. Observed power obtained was 0.621, 0.722, and 0.625, respectively. Other factors studied did not correlate with Hb difference.
CONCLUSION: Hypertension, puncture site, and operative duration have significant impact on estimated Hb deficiency during PCNL. However, the effect size is rather small despite adequate study power obtained. Nonetheless, operative position (supine or prone), puncture number, or tract dilatation size did not correlate with Hb difference. The mainstay of reducing bleeding in PCNL is still meticulous operative technique. Our study findings also suggest that PCNL can be safely done by urology trainees under supervision in suitably selected patient, without increasing risk of bleeding.
METHODS: The Asian Urological Surgery Training and Educational Group (AUSTEG) Laparoscopic Upper Tract Surgery Course implemented and validated the FLS program for its usage in laparoscopic surgical training. Delegates' basic laparoscopic skills were assessed using three different training models (peg transfer, precision cutting, and intra-corporeal suturing). They also performed live porcine laparoscopic surgery at the same workshop. Live surgery skills were assessed by blinded faculty using the OSATS rating scale.
RESULTS: From March 2016 to March 2019, a total of 81 certified urologists participated in the course, with a median of 5 years of post-residency experience. Although differences in task time did not reach statistical significance, those with more surgical experience were visibly faster at completing the peg transfer and intra-corporeal suturing FLS tasks. However, they took longer to complete the precision cutting task than participants with less experience. Overall OSATS scores correlated weakly with all three FLS tasks (peg transfer time: r=-0.331, r 2=0.110; precision cutting time: r=-0.240, r 2=0.058; suturing with intra-corporeal knot time: r=-0.451, r 2=0.203).
CONCLUSION: FLS task parameters did not correlate strongly with OSATS globing rating scale performance. Although FLS task models demonstrated strong validity, it is important to assimilate the inconsistencies when benchmarking technical proficiency against real-life operative competence, as evaluated by FLS and OSATS, respectively.