APPROACH: We compared network metrics derived from unconditional and conditional graphical networks, obtained using coherence and multivariate partial coherence (MVPC), respectively. Graphical networks were constructed using coherence and MVPC estimates, and binary and weighted network metrics derived from these: node degree, path length, clustering coefficients and small-world index.
MAIN RESULTS: Network metrics were applied to simulated and experimental single unit spike train data. Simulated data used a 10x10 grid of simulated cortical neurons with centre-surround connectivity. Conditional network metrics gave a more accurate representation of the known connectivity: Numbers of excitatory connections had range 3-11, unconditional binary node degree had range 6-80, conditional node degree had range 2-13. Experimental data used multi-electrode array recording with 19 single-units from left and right hippocampal brain areas in a rat model for epilepsy. Conditional network analysis showed similar trends to simulated data, with lower binary node degree and longer binary path lengths compared to unconditional networks.
SIGNIFICANCE: We conclude that conditional networks, where common dependencies are removed through partial coherence analysis, give a more accurate representation of the interactions in a graphical network model. These results have important implications for graphical network analyses of brain networks and suggest that functional networks should be derived using partial correlation, based on MVPC estimates, as opposed to the common approach of pair-wise correlation.
APPROACH: Data from 324 participants (166 HC and 158 MCI) were analyzed using automated artifact rejection and source reconstruction. Spectral biomarkers, including sensor-space and sourcespace representations, were extracted from the magnetometer and gradiometer signals. Five inverse-solution methods were assessed (including linearly constrained minimum variance [LCMV] and exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography analysis [eLORETA]) to increase the robustness of source-based biomarker selection. Multiple classifiers, including a support vector machine (SVM) and L1-regularized logistic regression (GLMNET), were compared using nested K-fold cross-validation embedded in Monte Carlo replications to limit overfitting.
MAIN RESULTS: The best performance was obtained by combining MRI features with source-based MEG features using GLMNET, achieving 76.31 ± 1.47% accuracy and 82.44 ± 1.44% AUC. MEG-only models showed strong discrimination and outperformed MRI-only analyses, particularly those based on the LCMV and eLORETA features. Across settings, the SVM and GLMNET were the most consistently effective classifiers.
SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support MEG/EEG spectral biomarkers, particularly source-based representations, as sensitive markers of early AD-related functional changes. Integrating MEG with MRI can further improve HC-versus-MCI classification. The study also demonstrated that rigorous validation (nested cross-validation with Monte Carlo replication) is essential for reliable biomarker assessment and for comparing preprocessing, inverse-solution, and classifier choices in translational neuroimaging pipelines.