PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult men with hypospadias repair in childhood were recruited (n = 55; aged 19.9 [IQR 19.2-22.1]). Coping styles were determined with the Utrecht Coping List (UCL) and results compared with a reference group of male students (n = 55, age 20-30 years, no medical history). Sub analysis of coping styles of the hypospadias groups was done based on three items: severity of hypospadias, time of last hypospadias surgery and occurrence of postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Compared to the reference groups, patients with hypospadias had higher scores on Avoidance (P
OBJECTIVE: To establish age- and gender-specific normal PVR urine volume in adolescents.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Healthy adolescents aged 12-18 years were recruited to undergo two uroflowmetry and PVR studies whenever they felt the urge to urinate. Adolescents with neurological disorders, known LUT dysfunction or UTI were excluded.
RESULTS: A total of 1050 adolescents were invited, but only 651 consented. Fourteen participants were excluded due to low bladder volume (BV 100 ml (n = 5) and missing information (n = 6). Ultimately, 894 uroflowmetry and PVR from 605 adolescents (mean age 14.6 ± 1.5 years) were analyzed. PVRs were higher in adolescents aged 15-18 years than in those aged 12-14 years (P 20 ml (7% BV) for males of both the age groups, and PVR >25 ml (9% BV) and PVR >35 ml (>10% BV) for females aged 12-14 and 15-18 years, respectively. Further investigation may be warranted if the repeat PVR is above the 95th percentile, i.e., PVR >30 ml (8% BV) and >30 ml (11% BV) for males aged 12-14 and 15-18 years, respectively, and PVR >35 ml (11% BV) and >45 ml (13% BV) for females aged 12-14 and 15-18 years, respectively.
CONCLUSION: PVR increases with age and varies by gender; thus, age-and gender-specific reference values should be used. Further data from other countries is required to determine whether the study's recommendations can be applied globally.
STUDY DESIGN: 50 patients aged 2-18 years who perform CIC were included in this cohort study. Patient compliance with CIC was evaluated using the validated Intermittent Catheterization Adherence Scale (ICAS). CIC difficulties were assessed using the validated Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire (ICDQ). Data was obtained on patients' co-morbidity, caregiver factors, socio-economic factors, CIC technique, access to catheters and facilities, urinary tract infections, incontinence, urology tests and treatment. Statistical analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Mean age was 6.68 ± 4.34 years. 32 (64%) patients commenced CIC within the first month of life. Mean daily CIC frequency was 4.70 ± 1.33.30 (60%) participants showed strong adherence to CIC. 39 (78%) participants were able to catheterize with no or minor difficulties. Pain (6, 12%), transient blocking sensation (6.12%), and urinary incontinence (3, 6%) were the predominant difficulties encountered. CIC performed by caregiver was associated with improved adherence compared to patient self-catheterization (p = 0.039). The mean age of participants who self-catheterized was 10.7 ± 3.7 years. Strong adherence was also observed among patients who purchased their own CIC catheters (p = 0.007). Participants with lower ICDQ score were more likely to be compliant with CIC (p = 0.007). CIC adherence was not affected by patient's age, gender, co-morbidity, mobility, caregiver factors, socio-economic factors, and age at initiation of CIC. There was no significant association between CIC adherence and febrile urinary tract infections, upper tract deterioration, and bladder stones at 6 months follow-up.
DISCUSSION: There is lower CIC adherence when a child begins to self-catheterize and healthcare providers should be alert during this period of transition. Though most patients with spina bifida have decreased urethral sensation, some patients do experience significant pain during CIC which may impact their compliance. These patients would need a review of their catheterization techniques to improve adherence. The limitations of our study are its modest sample size from a single center and short study period. Our study provides insights into the feasibility of instituting CIC in developing countries.
CONCLUSION: Strong CIC adherence was observed among patients who were catheterized by their caregiver, purchased their own CIC catheters, and encountered minimal difficulties during catheterization. CIC adherence had no effect on short-term urological outcomes.