Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Sui Lin CT, Prepageran N
    J Vestib Res, 2021 Dec 17.
    PMID: 34924408 DOI: 10.3233/VES-210087
    BACKGROUND: Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD) is a chronic functional disorder which interferes with the way individuals experience their personal, social and work life.

    OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of disease duration in PPPD on the quality of life (QOL), dizziness handicap and mental health on the patients.

    METHODS: A prospective study comparing the EQ-5D for QOL, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and DASS-21 between 27 patients with PPPD and 27 of those who have recovered from an acute vestibular event. Similar parameters between PPPD patients with symptoms less than one year and more than a year were compared.

    RESULTS: The PPPD patients were predominantly females and middle-aged with significantly higher DHI scores (mean 48.3 + 25.7, p = 0.00002), higher total mean scores in the DASS-21 (mean 21.6 + 13.7, p = 0.009) and poorer QOL with mean EQ-5D VAS of 67.9 + 17.3 (p <  0.00001). PPPD patients with symptoms for more than a year had significant increase in physical handicap (p = 0.041) as well as anxiety levels (p = 0.008).

    CONCLUSIONS: PPPD is predominantly seen in females and middle-aged which significantly reduces the QOL, increases dizziness handicap and increases depression, anxiety and stress levels. The increase in duration of illness further increases the anxiety levels and physical handicap.

  2. Se To PL, Ajit Singh DK, Whitney SL
    J Vestib Res, 2022;32(1):79-86.
    PMID: 34151874 DOI: 10.3233/VES-190731
    BACKGROUND: Adults with unilateral posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) may continue to present with residual dizziness and balance impairments after the canalith repositioning maneuver (CRM). Customized Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) in addition to the standard CRM may improve postural control in adults with BPPV. However, the effectiveness of this intervention for improving dyanmic gait measures in adults with BPPV is unknown.

    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the effectiveness of customized VR in addition to the standard CRM on dynamic gait measures among adults with unilateral posterior canal BPPV.

    METHODS: In this double blind, randomized controlled trial, 28 adults with BPPV were randomized to either control (n = 14, age: 54.36±8.55) or experimental (n = 14, age: 50.71±9.88) groups. The experimental and control groups received customized VR plus standard CRM for six weeks and standard CRM for two weeks respectively. Dynamic gait measures (duration of a complete gait cycle, stride velocity, turning duration and number of steps while turning) were recorded using a portable mobility sensor (iTUG) at baseline, week 4 and 6. A mixed model ANOVA was used to estimate the main effects of the interventions.

    RESULTS: During walking, a group effect was demonstrated on gait duration, stride velocity, turning duration and number of steps while turning (p 

  3. Al-Omari MM, Abuzaid SM, Khair HJ, Manaf H, Alghwiri AA
    J Vestib Res, 2025 Mar 14.
    PMID: 40085770 DOI: 10.1177/09574271251326587
    BackgroundPersistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) represents a relatively new vestibular diagnosis that has garnered attention within the medical community. Consequently, there is a pressing demand for efficacious management strategies.ObjectiveTo assess the comparative effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) versus vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) in improving PPPD symptoms.MethodsWe randomly assigned a cohort of 42 individuals conclusively diagnosed with PPPD to two distinct groups. The experimental group included 21 participants who received a combination of VR and optokinetic stimulation in addition to VRT, while the control group, also made up of 21 individuals, only received optokinetic stimulation in conjunction with VRT. We administered the intervention sessions twice weekly over a span of 6 weeks, resulting in a total of 10-intervention sessions. Additionally, baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up assessments were conducted.ResultsOur analysis revealed that participants in both groups significantly improved with no significant differences between the groups. Individuals undergoing VR interventions demonstrated marked improvements across all of the assessed parameters including the primary outcome measure that were reduced from 41.55 (11.87) to 23.40 (14.17) (p<0.001). Moreover, participants in the control group also displayed notable enhancements in select outcome measures post-intervention including the primary outcome measure that were reduced from 43.60 (12.75) to 26.10 (16.25) (p = 0.001). All participants in both groups maintained significant improvement in the severity of PPPD after 1 year of the. However, the study cannot determine if this change was definitely from the treatment because there was no non-treatment control group.ConclusionsThe study found that the addition of VR to a well-structured VRT did not significantly improve clinical outcomes, indicating a need for further investigation into more effective approaches to yield meaningful clinical benefits. Moreover, adding a control group with no intervention would help revealing a real effect of the intervention.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links