Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Chuan A, Jeyaratnam B, Fathil S, Ferraro LH, Kessow A, Lim YC, et al.
    Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2021 10;46(10):867-873.
    PMID: 34285116 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102934
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While there are several published recommendations and guidelines for trainees undertaking subspecialty Fellowships in regional anesthesia, a similar document describing a core regional anesthesia curriculum for non-fellowship trainees is less well defined. We aimed to produce an international consensus for the training and teaching of regional anesthesia that is applicable for the majority of worldwide anesthesiologists.

    METHODS: This anonymous, electronic Delphi study was conducted over two rounds and distributed to current and immediate past (within 5 years) directors of regional anesthesia training worldwide. The steering committee formulated an initial list of items covering nerve block techniques, learning objectives and skills assessment and volume of practice, relevant to a non-fellowship regional anesthesia curriculum. Participants scored these items in order of importance using a 10-point Likert scale, with free-text feedback. Strong consensus items were defined as highest importance (score ≥8) by ≥70% of all participants.

    RESULTS: 469 participants/586 invitations (80.0% response) scored in round 1, and 402/469 participants (85.7% response) scored in round 2. Participants represented 66 countries. Strong consensus was reached for 8 core peripheral and neuraxial blocks and 17 items describing learning objectives and skills assessment. Volume of practice for peripheral blocks was uniformly 16-20 blocks per anatomical region, while ≥50 neuraxial blocks were considered minimum.

    CONCLUSIONS: This international consensus study provides specific information for designing a non-fellowship regional anesthesia curriculum. Implementation of a standardized curriculum has benefits for patient care through improving quality of training and quality of nerve blocks.

  2. Kim J, Yun M, Han AH, Pauzi MF, Jeong JH, Yoo Y, et al.
    Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2024 Jul 08;49(7):528-535.
    PMID: 37726196 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104624
    BACKGROUND: Thoracic sympathetic ganglion block (TSGB) is a procedure to manage sympathetically maintained upper extremity pain (sympathetically maintained pain). To date, only a few studies have evaluated the clinical effectiveness of TSGB in pain medicine. This study investigated (1) the relationship between technical success of TSGB and pain reduction in patients with chronic upper extremity pain and (2) relevant clinical factors for a positive TSGB outcome.

    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical data in 232 patients who received TSGB from 2004 to 2020. Technical success and a positive outcome of TSGB were defined as a temperature increase of ≥1.5°C at 20 min and a pain reduction with ≥2 points on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale at 2 weeks post-TSGB, respectively. Correlations were assessed using correlation coefficients (R), and multivariable regression model was used to identify factors relevant to TSGB outcomes.

    RESULTS: 207 patients were ultimately analyzed; among them, 115 (55.5%) patients positively responded to TSGB, and 139 (67.1%) achieved technical success after TSGB. No significant relationship existed between the pain reduction and the temperature increase after TSGB (R=0.013, p=0.855). Comorbid diabetes (OR 4.200) and adjuvant intake (OR 3.451) were positively associated, and psychiatric comorbidity (OR 0.327) and pain duration (OR 0.973) were negatively associated with TSGB outcome.

    CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant association between the temperature increase and pain reduction after TSGB. Further studies are warranted to identify significant factors associated with TSGB outcomes in patients with complex regional pain syndrome and neuropathic pain diseases.

  3. Kim J, Rho H, Yoo Y, Cha J, Park S, Kim H, et al.
    Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2025 Feb 17.
    PMID: 39961729 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-106111
    BACKGROUND: Despite the significant role of impaired bone metabolism in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), the clinical implications of osteopenia remain a focal point of investigation. We examined the prevalence and risk factors of affected limb osteopenia in CRPS and its association with the response to sympathetic blockade.

    METHODS: 167 patients with CRPS who underwent CT of their affected limbs were retrospectively reviewed. After conducting univariable analyses where regional osteopenia determined by CT was dependent and other clinical factors were independent variables, the first multivariable analysis assessed risk predictors associated with regional osteopenia in CRPS. Next, after conducting univariable analyses where sympathetic block response was dependent and others, including regional osteopenia, were independent variables, the second multivariable model predicted factors associated with the response to sympathetic blockades, followed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

    RESULTS: Among 116 patients, regional osteopenia was identified in 72.2% early (<1 year) and 52.5% persistent CRPS. In the first multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and other variables with p values<0.1 from initial univariable analyses, older age (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.10) and positive three-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) (OR 3.94; 95% CI 1.46 to 10.66) were significantly associated with regional osteopenia. In the second multivariable model adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and other variables with p values<0.1 from univariable analyses, early phase (OR 5.49; 95% CI 1.44 to 20.88), regional osteopenia (OR 5.11; 95% CI 1.49 to 17.53), and positive TPBS (OR 6.30; 95% CI 2.21 to 17.93) were significantly associated with positive responses to sympathetic blockade in CRPS, showing excellent performance characteristics with a predicted probability>0.358 (sensitivity 0.86; specificity 0.76).

    CONCLUSION: Regional osteopenia in the affected limb can anticipate positive responses to sympathetic blockade when combined with TPBS in early CRPS.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links