BACKGROUND: Despite the rising burden of musculoskeletal (MSK) problems (MSK conditions, MSK pain, and MSK injury and trauma) in most countries, actions to improve (strengthen) systems for supporting MSK health are often low on the priority list, relative to other noncommunicable diseases. Delivering effective, person-centered and equitable MSK health care requires strengthening systems for health, for example, through policy, financing, service delivery, and workforce initiatives. A critical, but often overlooked component is genuine integration of lived experience perspectives to cocreate care and systems that are responsive to people's needs and contexts. CLINICAL QUESTION: How can cocreation approaches support effective, person-centered and equitable MSK health care? What principles can stakeholders adopt to build responsive health systems? KEY RESULTS: Lived experience perspectives are not systematically integrated in initiatives to strengthen health systems. However, such integration is critical to creating equitable and person-centered health systems that provide care and support healthy populations. Cocreation principles and frameworks can guide processes to strengthen health systems, which must include historically marginalized groups and consider social and environmental contexts as they relate to health. CLINICAL APPLICATION: Clinicians, educators, and policy-makers play a critical role in creating equitable health systems and environments, and driving system reform with people who have lived experience. Genuine cocreation approaches capture diverse economic development (in particular, low-resource settings where health inequities are more prevalent), span the life course and diagnostic categories, are appropriate and/or adapted for the context and setting, and reflect evolving standards and opportunities for MSK health. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(4):1-10. Epub: 12 December 2022. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.11427.
BACKGROUND: The Lancet Series of Low Back Pain (LBP) highlighted the lack of LBP data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The study aimed to describe (1) what LBP care is currently delivered in LMICs, and (2) how that care is delivered. METHODS: An online mixed-methods study. A Consortium for LBP in LMICs (n=65) was developed with an expert panel of leading LBP researchers (>2 publications on LBP) and multidisciplinary clinicians and patient partners with five years of clinical/lived LBP experience in LMICs. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Two researchers independently analyzed qualitative data using deductive and inductive coding and developed a thematic framework. FINDINGS: Forty-seven (85%) of 55 invited panel members representing 32 LMICs completed the survey (38% women; 62% men). The panel included clinicians (34%), researchers (28%), educators (6%), and patient partners (4%). Pharmacotherapies and electrophysiological agents were the most used LBP treatments. The Thematic Framework comprised of eight themes: (1) Self-management is ubiquitous; (2) Medicines are the cornerstone; (3) Traditional therapies have a place; (4) Society plays an important role; (5) Imaging use is very common; (6) Reliance on passive approaches; (7) Social determinants influence LBP care pathway; and (8) Health systems are ill-prepared to address LBP burden. INTERPRETATION: LBP care in LMICs did not consistently align with the best available evidence. Findings will help research prioritization in LMICs and guide global LBP clinical guidelines. FUNDING: The lead author's Fellowship was supported by the International Association for the Study of Pain.