Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Lee CY, Izaham A, Zainuddin K
    Int J Obstet Anesth, 2013 Nov;22(4):356-8.
    PMID: 23993805 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.03.017
    Matched MeSH terms: Anesthesia, Obstetrical/methods*
  2. Ng YL, Segaran S, Yim CCW, Lim BK, Hamdan M, Gan F, et al.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2024 Dec;231(6):651.e1-651.e11.
    PMID: 38521233 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.018
    BACKGROUND: Contemporary guidance for preoperative feeding allows solids up to 6 hours and clear fluids up to 2 hours before anesthesia. Clinical trial evidence to support this approach for cesarean delivery is lacking. Many medical practitioners continue to follow conservative policies of no intake from midnight to the time of surgery, especially in pregnant women.

    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the pragmatic approach of permitting free access to water up to the call to dispatch to the operating theater vs fasting from midnight in preoperative oral intake restriction for planned cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia on perioperative vomiting and maternal satisfaction.

    STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the obstetrical unit of the University of Malaya Medical Centre from October 2020 to May 2022. A total of 504 participants scheduled for planned cesarean delivery were randomized: 252 undergoing preoperative free access to water up to the call to dispatch to the operating theater (intervention group) and 252 undergoing fasting from midnight (fasting arm). The primary outcomes were perioperative vomiting and maternal satisfaction. Analyses were performed using t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test, as appropriate.

    RESULTS: Of note, 9 of 252 patients (3.6%) in the intervention group and 24 of 252 patients (9.5%) in the control group had vomiting at up to 6 hours after completion of cesarean delivery (relative risk, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.79; P=.007), and the maternal satisfaction scores (0-10 visual numerical rating scale) were 9 (interquartile range, 8-10) in the intervention group and 5 (interquartile range, 3-7) in the control group (P

    Matched MeSH terms: Anesthesia, Obstetrical/methods
  3. Chiang CF, Hasan MS, Tham SW, Sundaraj S, Faris A, Ganason N
    J Clin Anesth, 2017 Jun;39:82-86.
    PMID: 28494915 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.03.025
    STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to determine if a slower speed of spinal anaesthesia injection would reduce the incidence of hypotension.

    STUDY DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.

    SETTING: Tertiary level hospital in Malaysia.

    PATIENTS: 77 patients undergoing elective Caesarean delivery.

    INTERVENTION: Differing speeds of spinal injection.

    MEASUREMENTS: Systolic blood pressure was assessed every minute for the first 10min and incidence of hypotension (reduction in blood pressure of >30% of baseline) was recorded. The use of vasopressor and occurrence of nausea/vomiting were also recorded.

    MAIN RESULTS: 36 patients in SLOW group and 41 patients in FAST group were recruited into the study. There was no significant difference in blood pressure drop of >30% (p=0.497) between the two groups. There was no difference in the amount of vasopressor used and incidence of nausea/vomiting in both groups.

    CONCLUSION: In our study population, there was no difference in incidence of hypotension and nausea/vomiting when spinal injection time is prolonged beyond 15s to 60s.

    TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT02275897. Registered on 15 October 2014.

    Matched MeSH terms: Anesthesia, Obstetrical/methods*
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links