Surgical treatment of the inferior turbinates is required for hypertrophic inferior turbinates refractory to medical treatments. The main goal of surgical reduction of the inferior turbinate is to relieve the obstruction while preserving the function of the turbinate. There have been a variety of surgical techniques described and performed over the years. Irrespective of the techniques and technologies employed, the surgical techniques are classified into two types, the mucosal-sparing and non-mucosal-sparing, based on the preservation of the medial mucosa of the inferior turbinates. Although effective in relieving nasal block, the non-mucosal-sparing techniques have been associated with postoperative complications such as excessive bleeding, crusting, pain, and prolonged recovery period. These complications are avoided in the mucosal-sparing approach, rendering it the preferred option. Although widely performed, there is significant confusion and detachment between current practices and their basic objectives. This conflict may be explained by misperception over the myriad of available surgical techniques and misconception of the rationale in performing the turbinate reduction. A comprehensive review of each surgical intervention is crucial to better define each procedure and improve understanding of the principle and mechanism involved.
Hypertrophy of the inferior turbinates are the major cause of nasal obstruction. CO2 lasers have been used to reduce the size of the inferior turbinates over the last 20 years. However, the many techniques of delivery of the laser show that there is no one standard method reducing the size of the turbinates. We now describe how the laser can be applied directly to the turbinates using a handpiece with a special nasal tip, thus overcoming the disadvantages delivery via arthroscopic devices, microscopes and fibers. This technique is further enhanced by coupling it with Swiftlase which swirls the focused beam in a 3 mm spot thus ablating tissue more quickly. This procedure is done under local anaesthesia. The ablation of the anterior third of the inferior turbinates effectively overcomes nasal obstruction. This new method was compared to the more traditional submucus diathermy. 22 patients were subjected to laser treatment whilst 20 patients were subjected to diathermy. The outcome was evaluated subjectively by the patients themselves at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. At the end of the study, the laser group reported a more significantly improved nasal airway (91% against 75%) and decreased rhinorrhea (72.7% against 35%) when compared to the diathermy group.