Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Ooi AL, Julia PE
    Spinal Cord, 2011 Dec;49(12):1203-5.
    PMID: 21788957 DOI: 10.1038/sc.2011.81
    Case report.
    Matched MeSH terms: Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control*
  2. Soh KL, Davidson PM, Leslie G, DiGiacomo M, Soh KG
    J Clin Nurs, 2013 Mar;22(5-6):856-65.
    PMID: 23398314 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12017
    To describe nurses' perceptions of evidence-based recommendations to prevent complications in a Malaysian intensive care unit.
    Matched MeSH terms: Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control*
  3. Yusmido YA, Hisamud-Din N, Mazlan M
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2014 Oct;50(5):557-60.
    PMID: 24694951
    Pressure ulcers are common among patients with spinal cord injury and can be very challenging to treat. The treatment involves multidisciplinary approach and ranges from simple pressure relieve and wound dressings to a more radical treatment like proximal lower limb amputations, especially in chronic cases with potential detrimental effects to physical and mental health.
    Matched MeSH terms: Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control*
  4. Yapp JH, Raja Ahmad RMK, Mahmud R, Mohtarrudin N, Mohamad Yusof L, Abdul Rahim E, et al.
    Wound Repair Regen, 2019 05;27(3):225-234.
    PMID: 30667138 DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12698
    Frequent repositioning is important to prevent pressure ulcer (PU) development, by relieving pressure and recovering damages on skin areas induced by repetitive loading. Although repositioning is the gold standard to prevent PU, there is currently no strategy for determining tissue condition under preventive approaches. In this study, the peak reactive hyperemia (RH) trends and ultrasonographic (US) features are compared with the tissue condition under histopathological examination to determine the potential use of these features in determining the tissue condition noninvasively. Twenty-one male Sprague-Dawley rats (seven per group), with body weight of 385-485 g, were categorized into three groups and subjected to different recovery times, each with three repetitive loading cycles at skin tissues above of right trochanter area. The first, second, and third groups were subjected to short (3 minutes), moderate (10 minutes), and prolonged (40 minutes) recovery, respectively, while applying fixed loading time and pressure (10 minutes and 50 mmHg, respectively), to provide different degree of recovery and tissue conditions (tissue damage and tissue recovery). Peak RH was measured in the three cycles to determine RH trend (increasing, decreasing, and inconsistent). All rat tissues were evaluated using ultrasound at pre- and post-experiment and rated by two raters to categorize the severity of tissue changes (no, mild, moderate, and severe). The tissue condition was also evaluated using histopathological examination to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. Most of the samples with increasing RH trend is related to abnormal tissue (71%); while inconsistent RH trends is more related to normal tissue (82%). There is no relationship between the tissue conditions evaluated under ultrasonographic and histopathological examination. Peak RH trend over repetitive loading may serve as a new feature for determining the tissue condition that leading to pressure ulcer.
    Matched MeSH terms: Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control*
  5. Yapp JH, Kamil R, Rozi M, Mohtarrudin N, Loqman MY, Ezamin AR, et al.
    J Tissue Viability, 2017 Aug;26(3):196-201.
    PMID: 28438463 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2017.03.002
    Tissue recovery is important in preventing tissue deterioration, which is induced by pressure and may lead to pressure ulcers (PU). Reactive hyperaemia (RH) is an indicator used to identify people at risk of PU. In this study, the effect of different recovery times on RH trend is investigated during repetitive loading. Twenty-one male Sprague-Dawley rats (seven per group), with body weight of 385-485 g, were categorised into three groups and subjected to different recovery times with three repetitive loading cycles. The first, second, and third groups were subjected to short (3 min), moderate (10 min), and prolonged (40 min) recovery, respectively, while fixed loading time and pressure (10 min and 50 mmHg, respectively). Peak hyperaemia was measured in the three cycles to determine trends associated with different recovery times. Three RH trends (increasing, decreasing, and inconsistent) were observed. As the recovery time is increased (3 min vs. 10 min vs. 40 min), the number of samples with increasing RH trend decreases (57% vs. 29% vs. 14%) and the number of samples with inconsistent RH trend increases (29% vs. 57% vs. 72%). All groups consists of one sample with decreasing RH trend (14%). Results confirm that different recovery times affect the RH trend during repetitive loading. The RH trend may be used to determine the sufficient recovery time of an individual to avoid PU development.
    Matched MeSH terms: Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links