Displaying all 7 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Cheong MYL
    Med J Malaysia, 1984 Sep;39(3):239-42.
    PMID: 6544927
    The paper discusses the results of 24 cases of Millin's prostatectomy in a District Hospital carried out between April and December 1983. The results show that the blood loss in the operation is usually not more than 600ml and therefore would not pose a strain on the blood bank. Postoperative bleeding is very minimal and again does not tax the nursing staff of an overcrowded, large ward in the District Hospital. The results for the patients are excellent.
    Matched MeSH terms: Prostatectomy/methods*
  2. Sreenevasan GA, Chelvanayagam DD
    Med J Malaysia, 1975 Dec;30(2):110-3.
    PMID: 1228375
    Matched MeSH terms: Prostatectomy/methods*
  3. Sundram M
    Urol Oncol, 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):677-81.
    PMID: 21062651 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.03.003
    Matched MeSH terms: Prostatectomy/methods*
  4. Harraz AM, Aldousari S, Eltafahny AI, Almoumen A, Thahir A, Ajrawi F, et al.
    Low Urin Tract Symptoms, 2025 Jan;17(1):e70006.
    PMID: 39788152 DOI: 10.1111/luts.70006
    OBJECTIVES: During holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP), blunt dissection (BD) by pushing the tip of the scope may exert mechanical force on the sphincter that could be avoided by adopting laser dissection (LD). This study evaluates the continence recovery in consecutive patients who underwent BD and LD.

    METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients who underwent LD was compared with a retrospective control that underwent BD. In both groups, early apical release was performed, and the adenoma was split at 12 O'clock after complete enucleation. In LD, a trans-capsular plane was sharply created by LD and is guided by the circular capsular fibers. A mechanical push with the resectoscope tip was used to create and maintain the ideal surgical plane in the BD group while the laser energy was used to achieve timely hemostasis. The primary outcome was stress urinary incontinence (SUI), defined as the need to use any number of pads, immediately after catheter removal, at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively.

    RESULTS: Consecutive 51 (48.6%) and 54 (51.4%) patients underwent BD and LD, respectively. The LD group tends to be older while other demographics were comparable. Both groups were comparable regarding the estimated prostate volume, enucleation time, and postoperative resolution of symptoms. Continence recovery was in favor of the LD group immediately after removing the catheter (77.8% vs. 43.1%; p 

    Matched MeSH terms: Prostatectomy/methods
  5. Guangquan T, Changyi L, Peng Z, Na L, Jumuddin FA
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2024 Sep 01;25(9):3023-3028.
    PMID: 39342579 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.9.3023
    OBJECTIVE: We conducted a study to assess the effectiveness and safety of three different surgical instruments for enucleation in treating high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). These instruments include red laser, green laser, and plasma surgical equipment for enucleation of the prostate.

    METHOD: In a retrospective analysis, 237 patients diagnosed with high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) underwent prostate enucleation using three different groups of surgical instruments at the Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University. These groups included the red laser device group (n = 67), the green laser device group (n = 61), and the plasma device group (n = 109). The study evaluated changes in prostate mass, blood loss, operation time, and postoperative efficacy at 1- and 6-month intervals, as well as any associated complications.

    RESULTS: The red and green laser surgical instrument groups demonstrated superiority over the plasma group in several aspects. (1) Operation Time: *1* Red laser group: 87.9 ± 14.7 minutes; *1* Green laser group: 86.1 ± 15.3 minutes. (2) Blood Loss: *1* Red laser group: 30.1 ± 5.9 mL; *2*Green laser group: 30.9 ± 6.1 mL. (3) Temporary Urinary Incontinence: *1*Red laser group: 3 cases (4.48%); *2*Green laser group: 2 cases (3.28%). These differences were statistically significant. Additionally, postoperative indicators such as IPSS(International Prostate Prostate Symptom Score), QoL(Quality of Life), Q max(The Maximum Flow Rate), and RUV(Residual Urine Volume) showed significant improvement in all three groups compared to the preoperative state.

    CONCLUSION: Red laser, green laser and plasma surgical devices were safe and effective in the treatment of high critical benign prostatic hyperplasia; laser surgical devices showed better performance in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding and complications.

    Matched MeSH terms: Prostatectomy/methods
  6. Ngoo KS, Honda M, Kimura Y, Yumioka T, Iwamoto H, Morizane S, et al.
    Int J Med Robot, 2019 Aug;15(4):e2018.
    PMID: 31115140 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2018
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

    METHODS: We prospectively reviewed HRQOL parameters using Short-Form Health Survey, patient self-reporting of urinary incontinence and International Index of Erectile Function, among patients who underwent RARP between 2010 and 2016.

    RESULTS: Among 249 men studied, all had significantly worse HRQOL domain scores at 1 month post operatively but 24 months after surgery, all domains reached or surpassed their baseline values. Only Bodily Pain, General Health, Role-Emotional, Mental Health domains, and Mental Health Composite were significantly improved. Improvement in urinary continence was mirrored by improvements in both Mental and Physical Component Scores.

    CONCLUSIONS: Within a 2-year post-operative period, men who underwent RARP had regained their overall quality of life. The recovery of urinary continence significantly impacted the mental, physical, emotional, and social well-being of those patients.

    Matched MeSH terms: Prostatectomy/methods*
  7. Fahmy O, Khairul-Asri MG, Schubert T, Renninger M, Stenzl A, Gakis G
    J Urol, 2017 02;197(2):385-390.
    PMID: 27569436 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.088
    PURPOSE: There is controversy in the literature about the oncologic significance of incidental prostate cancer detected at radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online search was done for studies reporting incidental prostate cancer in cystoprostatectomy specimens. After following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines we identified a total of 34 reports containing 13,140 patients who underwent radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer with no previous history of prostate cancer. A cumulative analysis was performed on the available data regarding prevalence, clinicopathological features and oncologic outcomes. RevMan, version 5.3 was used for data meta-analysis.

    RESULTS: Of the 13,140 patients incidental prostate cancer was detected in 3,335 (24.4%). Incidental prostate cancer was significantly associated with greater age (Z = 3.81, p = 0.0001, d = 0.27, 95% CI -0.14-0.68), lymphovascular invasion of bladder cancer (Z = 2.07, p = 0.04, r = 0.14, 95% CI 0.09-0.18) and lower 5-year overall survival (Z = 2.2, p = 0.03). Among patients with clinically significant and insignificant prostate cancer those with clinically significant prostate cancer significantly more frequently showed a positive finding on digital rectal examination (Z = 3.12, p = 0.002, r = 0.10, 95% CI 0-0.19) and lower 5-year overall survival (Z = 2.49, p = 0.01) whereas no effect of age was observed (p = 0.15). Of 1,320 patients monitored for biochemical recurrence prostate specific antigen recurrence, defined as prostate specific antigen greater than 0.02 ng/ml, developed in 25 (1.9%) at between 3 and 102 months.

    CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that incidental prostate cancer detected during histopathological examination of radical cystoprostatectomy specimens might be linked with adverse characteristics and outcomes in patients with invasive bladder cancer.

    Matched MeSH terms: Prostatectomy/methods*
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links