Displaying all 3 publications

  1. Jabbarzadeh Kaboli P, Ismail P, Ling KH
    PLoS ONE, 2018;13(3):e0193941.
    PMID: 29565994 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193941
    RAF kinases are a family of enzymes in the MAP kinase pathway that contribute to the development of different types of cancer. BRAF is the most important member of RAF kinases. BRAF mutations have been detected in 7% of all cancers and 66% of melanomas; as such, the FDA has approved a few BRAF inhibitor drugs to date. However, BRAF can activate CRAF leading to resistance to BRAF inhibitors. Berberine (BBR) is an alkaloid that is widely distributed in different plant species. Several studies have been carried out on the anti-cancer effects of BBR but direct targets of BBR are unknown. In this study, interactions of BBR derivatives against BRAF and CRAF kinases were modeled and predicted using an in silico-based approach. To analyze and identify the residues important in BRAF docking, we modeled interactions of ATP, the universal substrate of BRAF, and found that Lys483 and Asp594 are the most important residues involved in both ATP and BBR binding [(The average score = -11.5 kcal/mol (ATP); Range of scores = -7.78 to -9.55 kcal/mol (BBR)]. In addition to these polar residues, Trp530 and Phe583 are also applicable to the molecular docking of BRAF. We also observed that Asp593 was excluded from the enzyme cavity, while Phe594 was included inside the cavity, making the enzyme inactive. Finally, three alternatives for BBR were identified with dual RAF inhibition effects [The best scores against BRAF = -11.62 kcal/mol (BBR-7), -10.64 kcal/mol (BBR-9), and -11.01 kcal/mol (BBR-10); the best scores against CRAF = -9.68 kcal/mol (BBR-7), -9.60 kcal/mol (BBR-9), and -9.20 kcal/mol (BBR-10)]. Direct effects of BBR derivatives against BRAF and CRAF kinases had not yet been reported previously, and, thus, for the first time, we report three cycloprotoberberines as lead compounds against RAF kinases.
    Matched MeSH terms: Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/antagonists & inhibitors
  2. Mohana-Kumaran N, Hill DS, Allen JD, Haass NK
    Pigment Cell Melanoma Res, 2014 Jul;27(4):525-39.
    PMID: 24655414 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.12242
    Melanoma drug resistance is often attributed to abrogation of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway. Targeting regulators of apoptosis is thus considered a promising approach to sensitizing melanomas to treatment. The development of small-molecule inhibitors that mimic natural antagonists of either antiapoptotic members of the BCL-2 family or the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), known as BH3- or SMAC-mimetics, respectively, are helping us to understand the mechanisms behind apoptotic resistance. Studies using BH3-mimetics indicate that the antiapoptotic BCL-2 protein MCL-1 and its antagonist NOXA are particularly important regulators of BCL-2 family signaling, while SMAC-mimetic studies show that both XIAP and the cIAPs must be targeted to effectively induce apoptosis of cancer cells. Although most solid tumors, including melanoma, are insensitive to these mimetic drugs as single agents, combinations with other therapeutics have yielded promising results, and tests combining them with BRAF-inhibitors, which have already revolutionized melanoma treatment, are a clear priority.
    Matched MeSH terms: Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/antagonists & inhibitors
  3. Héritier S, Emile JF, Barkaoui MA, Thomas C, Fraitag S, Boudjemaa S, et al.
    J. Clin. Oncol., 2016 09 01;34(25):3023-30.
    PMID: 27382093 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9508
    PURPOSE: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is an inflammatory myeloid neoplasia with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and outcomes in children. The somatic BRAF(V600E) mutation occurs frequently, but clinical significance remains to be determined.

    PATIENTS AND METHODS: BRAF(V600E) mutation was investigated in a French LCH cohort. We analyzed associations between mutation status and clinical presentation, extent of disease, reactivation rate, response to therapy, and long-term permanent sequelae.

    RESULTS: Among 315 patients with successfully determined BRAF status, 173 (54.6%) carried a BRAF(V600E) mutation. Patients with BRAF(V600E) manifested more severe disease than did those with wild-type BRAF. Patients with BRAF(V600E) comprised 87.8% of patients (43 of 49) with multisystem LCH with risk organ involvement (liver, spleen, hematology), 68.6% of patients (35 of 51) with multisystem LCH without risk organ involvement, 43.9% of patients (86 of 196) with single-system LCH, and 42.1% of patients (8 of 19) with lung-involved LCH (P < .001). BRAF(V600E) mutation was also associated with organ involvement that could lead to permanent, irreversible damage, such as neurologic (75%) and pituitary (72.9%) injuries. Compared with patients with wild-type BRAF, patients with BRAF(V600E) more commonly displayed resistance to combined vinblastine and corticosteroid therapy (21.9% v 3.3%; P = .001), showed a higher reactivation rate (5-year reactivation rate, 42.8% v 28.1%; P = .006), and had more permanent, long-term consequences from disease or treatment (27.9% v 12.6%; P = .001).

    CONCLUSION: In children with LCH, BRAF(V600E) mutation was associated with high-risk features, permanent injury, and poor short-term response to chemotherapy. Further population-based studies should be undertaken to confirm our observations and to assess the impact of BRAF inhibitors for this subgroup of patients who may benefit from targeted therapy.

    Matched MeSH terms: Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/antagonists & inhibitors
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (tengcl@gmail.com)

External Links