Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Borges JLC, Sousa da Silva M, Ward RJ, Diemer KM, Yeap SS, Lewiecki EM
    J Clin Densitom, 2019 07 10;22(4):484-488.
    PMID: 31375350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.07.005
    Vertebral fracture (VF) is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. VFs are associated with a decline in quality of life and high morbidity and mortality. The presence of a VF is a significant risk factor for developing another fracture; however, most VFs are not clinically recognized and diagnosed. Vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a low cost, low radiation, convenient, and reliable method to identify VFs. The finding of a previously unrecognized VF may change the assessment of fracture risk, diagnostic classification, and treatment strategies. Vertebral fracture assessment or radiographic lateral spine imaging should be repeated in patients with continued high risk for fracture (e.g., historical height loss >4 cm [>1.5 inches], self-reported but undocumented vertebral fracture, or glucocorticoid therapy equivalent to ≥5 mg of prednisone or equivalent per day for greater than or equal to 3 months).
    Matched MeSH terms: Spinal Fractures/diagnosis*
  2. Hussin P, Chan CY, Saw LB, Kwan MK
    Emerg Med J, 2009 Sep;26(9):677-8.
    PMID: 19700594 DOI: 10.1136/emj.2008.064972
    U-shaped sacral fracture is a very rare injury. This injury is easily missed and the diagnosis is often delayed as it is difficult to detect on the anteroposterior view of the pelvic radiograph. It is highly unstable and neurological injury is common. Two cases of U-shaped sacral fractures are reported here in which the diagnosis was delayed resulting in the late development of cauda equina syndrome. In these two cases, full recoveries were achieved following surgical decompression. A high index of suspicion with proper clinical and radiographic assessments will decrease the incidence of missed diagnosis and prevent the occurrence of delayed neurological deficits.
    Matched MeSH terms: Spinal Fractures/diagnosis*
  3. Chung WH, Eu WC, Chiu CK, Chan CYW, Kwan MK
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2019 12 27;28(1):2309499019888977.
    PMID: 31876259 DOI: 10.1177/2309499019888977
    PURPOSE: To describe the reduction technique of thoracolumbar burst fracture using percutaneous monoaxial screws and its radiological outcomes compared to polyaxial screws.

    METHODS: All surgeries were performed by minimally invasive technique with either percutaneous monoaxial or percutaneous polyaxial screws inserted at adjacent fracture levels perpendicular to both superior end plates. Fracture reduction is achieved with adequate rod contouring and distraction maneuver. Radiological parameters were measured during preoperation, postoperation, and follow-up.

    RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were included. Eleven patients were performed with monoaxial pedicle screws and 10 patients performed with polyaxial pedicle screws. Based on AO thoracolumbar classification system, 10 patients in the monoaxial group had A3 fracture type and 1 had A4. In the polyaxial group, six patients had A3 and four patients had A4. Total correction of anterior vertebral height (AVH) ratio was 0.30 ± 0.10 and 0.08 ± 0.07 in monoaxial and polyaxial groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Total correction of posterior vertebral height (PVH) ratio was 0.11 ± 0.05 and 0.02 ± 0.02 in monoaxial and polyaxial groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Monoaxial group achieved more correction of 13° (62.6%) in local kyphotic angle compared to 8.2° (48.0%) in polyaxial group. Similarly, in regional kyphotic angle, 16.5° (103.1%) in the monoaxial group and 8.1° (76.4%) in the polyaxial group were achieved.

    CONCLUSIONS: Monoaxial percutaneous pedicle screws inserted at adjacent fracture levels provided significantly better fracture reduction compared to polyaxial screws in thoracolumbar fractures.

    Matched MeSH terms: Spinal Fractures/diagnosis
  4. Chiu CK, Lisitha KA, Elias DM, Yong VW, Chan CYW, Kwan MK
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2018 10 26;26(3):2309499018806700.
    PMID: 30352524 DOI: 10.1177/2309499018806700
    BACKGROUND: This prospective clinical-radiological study was conducted to determine whether the dynamic mobility stress radiographs can predict the postoperative vertebral height restoration, kyphosis correction, and cement volume injected after vertebroplasty.

    METHODS: Patients included had the diagnosis of significant back pain caused by osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture secondary to trivial injury. All the patients underwent routine preoperative sitting lateral spine radiograph, supine stress lateral spine radiograph, and supine anteroposterior spine radiograph. The radiological parameters recorded were anterior vertebral height (AVH), middle vertebral height (MVH), posterior vertebral height (PVH), MVH level below, wedge endplate angle (WEPA), and regional kyphotic angle (RKA). The supine stress versus sitting difference (SSD) for all the above parameters were calculated.

    RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (4 males; 24 females) with the mean age of 75.6 ± 7.7 years were recruited into this study. The mean cement volume injected was 5.5 ± 1.8 ml. There was no difference between supine stress and postoperative radiographs for AVH ( p = 0.507), PVH ( p = 0.913) and WEPA ( p = 0.379). The MVH ( p = 0.026) and RKA ( p = 0.005) were significantly less in the supine stress radiographs compared to postoperative radiographs. There was significant correlation ( p < 0.05) between supine stress and postoperative AVH, MVH, PVH, WEPA, and RKA. The SSD for AVH, PVH, WEPA, and RKA did not have significant correlation with the cement volume ( p > 0.05). Only the SSD-MVH had significant correlation with cement volume, but the correlation was weak ( r = 0.39, p = 0.04).

    CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic mobility stress radiographs can predict the postoperative vertebral height restoration and kyphosis correction after vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic fracture with intravertebral clefts. However, it did not reliably predict the amount of cement volume injected as it was affected by other factors.

    Matched MeSH terms: Spinal Fractures/diagnosis*
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links