Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Watters DA, McCaig E, Nagra S, Kevau I
    Br J Surg, 2019 01;106(2):e53-e61.
    PMID: 30620072 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11057
    BACKGROUND: There is a surgical workforce shortage in Papua New Guinea (PNG), the Pacific and Timor Leste. Previously, Pacific Island specialists who trained overseas tended to migrate.

    METHODS: A narrative review was undertaken of the training programmes delivered through the University of Papua New Guinea and Fiji National University's Fiji School of Medicine, and support provided through Australian Aid and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS), including scholarships and visiting medical teams.

    RESULTS: The Fiji School of Medicine MMed programme, which commenced in 1998, has 39 surgical graduates. Sixteen of 22 Fijians, nine of ten Solomon Islanders and four of five in Vanuatu currently reside and/or work in-country. Surgical training in PNG began in 1975, and now has 104 general surgical graduates, 11 of whom originate from the Pacific Islands or Timor Leste. The PNG retention rate of local graduates is 97 per cent, with 80 per cent working in the public sector. Twenty-two surgeons have also undertaken subspecialty training. Timor Leste has trained eight surgical specialists in PNG, Fiji, Indonesia or Malaysia. All have returned to work in-country. The RACS has managed Australian Aid programmes, providing pro bono visiting medical teams to support service delivery and, increasingly, capacity building in the region. The RACS has funded scholarships and international travel grants to further train or sustain the surgical specialists.

    CONCLUSION: The local MMed programmes have been highly successful in retaining specialists in the region. Partnerships with Australian Aid and RACS have been effective in ensuring localization of the faculty and ongoing professional development.

    Matched MeSH terms: Surgeons/statistics & numerical data
  2. Kwan MK, Chiu CK, Chan CY
    Eur Spine J, 2017 Jan;26(1):155-161.
    PMID: 27734195 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4803-y
    PURPOSE: To assess the pattern of intra-operative blood loss at various surgical stages comparing between single and two surgeons.

    METHODS: Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who underwent instrumented posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery from two centres between June 2014 and December 2015 were prospectively recruited into this study. The patients were grouped into Group 1 (single surgeon) and Group 2 (two surgeons). One to one matching using 'prospective propensity score-matched cohort patient sampling method' was done. The surgery was divided into six stages: stage 1-exposure, stage 2-screw insertion, stage 3-release, stage 4-correction, stage 5-corticotomies and bone grafting and stage 6-closure.

    RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were recruited. Of 86 patients who were operated by the two surgeons, 30 patients were matched with 30 patients that were operated by a single surgeon. Operation duration was significantly longer in Group 1 (257.3 ± 51.4 min) compared to Group 2 (164.0 ± 25.7 min). The total blood loss was significantly higher in Group 1 (1254.7 ± 521.5 mL) compared to Group 2 (893.7 ± 518.4 mL). Total blood loss/level fused was significantly higher in Group 1 (117.5 ± 42.8 mL/level) compared to Group 2 (82.6 ± 39.4 mL/level). Group 1 had significantly higher blood loss and blood loss/level fused for stages 1, 2 and 3. Group 2 had lower incidence of allogenic blood transfusion.

    CONCLUSIONS: In PSF surgery for AIS patients, two-surgeon strategy was associated with shorter operation duration, lesser blood loss and lower incidence of allogenic blood transfusion.

    Matched MeSH terms: Surgeons/statistics & numerical data*
  3. Kim M, Meurette G, Ragu R, Lehur PA
    Tech Coloproctol, 2016 Jun;20(6):395-399.
    PMID: 27170284 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-016-1473-z
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to perform a survey on the surgical management of obstructed defecation (OD) across advocated selected coloproctological experts across Europe.

    METHODS: Surgeons from 42 centers of coloproctology in Europe were asked to complete a questionnaire, including seven questions about their past and present operative treatment strategy for patients with OD.

    RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 32 experts of pelvic floor surgery in 13 European countries. All but one indicated that they consider surgical treatment for OD. Seventy-four percent of these have been using transanal stapled rectal resection (STARR) and 96 % transabdominal rectopexy. While only 65 %, who have begun performing STARR are still using transanal resection, the technique is still being used by all surgeons performing abdominal procedures. Rectopexy only, STARR only, or both approaches are offered by 52, 3, and 45 % of surgeons, respectively.

    CONCLUSIONS: The use of STARR in the treatment of OD is decreasing among European opinion leaders in the field of pelvic floor surgery, while the application of transabdominal procedures continues.

    Matched MeSH terms: Surgeons/statistics & numerical data
  4. Adil MT, Aminian A, Bhasker AG, Rajan R, Corcelles R, Zerrweck C, et al.
    Obes Surg, 2020 02;30(2):483-492.
    PMID: 31677017 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-019-04195-7
    BACKGROUND: Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide. There is currently no scientific study aimed at understanding variations in practices concerning this procedure. The aim of this study was to study the global variations in perioperative practices concerning SG.

    METHODS: A 37-item questionnaire-based survey was conducted to capture the perioperative practices of the global community of bariatric surgeons. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

    RESULTS: Response of 863 bariatric surgeons from 67 countries with a cumulative experience of 520,230 SGs were recorded. A total of 689 (80%) and 764 (89%) surgeons listed 13 absolute and relative contraindications, respectively. 65% (n = 559) surgeons perform routine preoperative endoscopy and 97% (n = 835) routinely use intraoperative orogastric tube for sizing the resection. A wide variation is observed in the diameter of the tube used. 73% (n = 627) surgeons start dividing the stomach at a distance of 3-5 cm from the pylorus, and 54% (n = 467) routinely use staple line reinforcement. Majority (65%, n = 565) of surgeons perform routine intraoperative leak test at the end of the procedure, while 25% (n = 218) surgeons perform a routine contrast study in the early postoperative period. Lifelong multivitamin/mineral, iron, vitamin D, calcium, and vitamin B12 supplementation is advocated by 66%, 29%, 40%, 38% and 44% surgeons, respectively.

    CONCLUSION: There is a considerable variation in the perioperative practices concerning SG. Data can help in identifying areas for future consensus building and more focussed studies.

    Matched MeSH terms: Surgeons/statistics & numerical data*
  5. Ishak A, Yahya MM, Halim AS
    Clin Breast Cancer, 2018 Oct;18(5):e1011-e1021.
    PMID: 29784600 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.04.012
    BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction after mastectomy is important in breast cancer care.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed to assess surgeons' and patients' perceptions toward breast reconstruction. Questionnaires were distributed to general and breast surgeons in East Coast Malaysian hospitals and Hospital Kuala Lumpur and to postmastectomy patients with and without breast reconstruction at the Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia and Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II. The response rates were 82.5% for the surgeons (n = 33), 95.4% for the patients with reconstruction (n = 63), and 95.5% for the patients without reconstruction (n = 278).

    RESULTS: The median surgeon age and experience was 42 and 6 years, respectively. Each surgeon saw an average of 20 new breast cancer cases annually. Most surgeons (86.7%) discussed reconstruction options with their patients but had only referred an average of 4 patients for reconstruction during a 3-year period. Surgeons' concerns regarding the qualitative outcome increased the likelihood of a breast reconstruction discussion (β = 4.833; P = .044). The women who underwent breast reconstruction were younger (mean age, 42 vs. 50 years), were more often working (69.4% vs. 42.2%), and more often had previous awareness of the option (90.3% vs. 44.3%). The most common reasons for undergoing breast reconstruction were "to feel more balanced" (92.1%) and "surgeon's strong recommendation" (92.1%). Previous knowledge of breast reconstruction increased the likelihood of reconstruction (odds ratio, 5.805; P = .026). Although 70% of surgeons thought that patients would not be interested in reconstruction, only 37.9% of patients with previous awareness reported having no interest.

    CONCLUSION: The low reconstruction rate (20.6%) can be attributed to the low referral rate. Patients' likelihood to undergo reconstruction with their surgeon's recommendation and with previous awareness were reflective of the surgeons' strong influence on their patients. Thus, clarification of surgeons' hypothetical criticisms could conceivably increase the reconstructive surgery rate.

    Matched MeSH terms: Surgeons/statistics & numerical data
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links