Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Sakai K, Storozhenko T, Mizukami T, Ohashi H, Bouisset F, Tajima A, et al.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2024 May;103(6):885-896.
    PMID: 38566527 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31020
    BACKGROUND: Two invasive methods are available to estimate microvascular resistance: bolus and continuous thermodilution. Comparative studies have revealed a lack of concordance between measurements of microvascular resistance obtained through these techniques.

    AIMS: This study aimed to examine the influence of vessel volume on bolus thermodilution measurements.

    METHODS: We prospectively included patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) undergoing bolus and continuous thermodilution assessments. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography to extract vessel volume. Coronary microvascular dysfunction was defined as coronary flow reserve (CFR) 

    Matched MeSH terms: Thermodilution*
  2. Collet C, Sakai K, Mizukami T, Ohashi H, Bouisset F, Caglioni S, et al.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2024 Dec;17(12):1463-1476.
    PMID: 39269414 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.07.018
    BACKGROUND: Approximately one-half of the patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) have evidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD).

    OBJECTIVES: This study aims to characterize patients with ANOCA by measuring their minimal microvascular resistance and to examine the pattern of vascular remodeling associated with these measurements.

    METHODS: The authors prospectively included patients with ANOCA undergoing continuous thermodilution assessment. Lumen volume and vessel-specific myocardial mass were quantified using coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). CMD was defined as coronary flow reserve <2.5 and high minimal microvascular resistance as >470 WU.

    RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were evaluated; 68 had CMD, and 22 of them showed high microvascular resistance. In patients with CMD, coronary flow reserve was 1.9 ± 0.38 vs 3.2 ± 0.81 in controls (P < 0.001). Lumen volume was significantly correlated with minimal microvascular resistance (r = -0.59 [95% CI: -0.45 to -0.71]; P < 0.001). In patients with CMD and high microvascular resistance, lumen volume was 40% smaller than in controls (512.8 ± 130.3 mm3 vs 853.2 ± 341.2 mm3; P < 0.001). Epicardial lumen volume assessed by coronary CTA was independently associated with minimal microvascular resistance (P < 0.001). The predictive capacity of lumen volume from coronary CTA for detecting high microvascular resistance showed an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.69-0.88).

    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CMD and high minimal microvascular resistance have smaller epicardial vessels than those without CMD. Coronary CTA detected high minimal microvascular resistance with very good diagnostic capacity. Coronary CTA could potentially aid in the diagnostic pathway for patients with ANOCA.

    Matched MeSH terms: Thermodilution
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links