Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Künzi V, Klap JM, Seiberling MK, Herzog C, Hartmann K, Kürsteiner O, et al.
    Vaccine, 2009 Jun 2;27(27):3561-7.
    PMID: 19464535 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.062
    Despite the established benefit of intramuscular (i.m.) influenza vaccination, new adjuvants and delivery methods for comparable or improved immunogenicity are being explored. Intradermal (i.d.) antigen administration is hypothesized to initiate an efficient immune response at reduced antigen doses similar to that observed after i.m. full dose vaccination.
    Matched MeSH terms: Vaccines, Virosome/immunology*
  2. Souza AR, Braga JA, de Paiva TM, Loggetto SR, Azevedo RS, Weckx LY
    Vaccine, 2010 Jan 22;28(4):1117-20.
    PMID: 20116631 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.05.046
    The immunogenicity and tolerability of virosome and of split influenza vaccines in patients with sickle cell anemia (SS) were evaluated. Ninety SS patients from 8 to 34 years old were randomly assigned to receive either virosome (n=43) or split vaccine (n=47). Two blood samples were collected, one before and one 4-6 weeks after vaccination. Antibodies against viral strains (2006) A/New Caledonia (H1N1), A/California (H3N2), B/Malaysia were determined using the hemagglutinin inhibition test. Post-vaccine reactions were recorded over 7 days. Seroconversion rates for H1N1, H3N2 and B were 65.1%, 60.4% and 83.7% for virosome vaccine, and 68.0%, 61.7% and 68.0% for split vaccine. Seroprotection rates for H1N1, H3N2 e B were 100%, 97.6% and 69.7% for virosome, and 97.8%, 97.8% and 76.6% for split vaccine. No severe adverse reactions were recorded. Virosome and split vaccines in patients with sickle cell anemia were equally immunogenic, with high seroconversion and seroprotection rates. Both vaccines were well tolerated.
    Matched MeSH terms: Vaccines, Virosome/immunology
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links