Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Prosthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi 75500, Pakistan
  • 2 Conservative Dentistry Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia
  • 3 Prosthodontics Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia
  • 4 Department of Prosthodontics, Army Medical College, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, National University of Medical Sciences, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
  • 5 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dow Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
  • 6 Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
  • 7 Division of Restorative Dentistry, Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia
J Clin Med, 2022 Dec 10;11(24).
PMID: 36555956 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247340

Abstract

The present study aimed to analyze mid horizontal facial third proportions, those being the interpupillary, inner intercanthal, and bizygomatic distance modified with golden proportion, The Preston proportion, golden percentage and 70% recurring esthetic dental proportion were used for determining maxillary anterior teeth width. A total of 230 participants took part in this study. The front dental and facial photographs along dental stone cast which were converted to three-dimensional (3D) models were used for evaluation. The mid horizontal facial third proportions showed no significant relationship with maxillary anterior teeth width without modification with dental proportions. Whereas, with modification, no statistically significant difference was found between inner-intercanthal distance by golden percentage and width of central incisors. The bizygomatic distance was greater than intercanine distance. While the interpupillary distance by golden proportion was found to be consistent with intercanine distance in female participants. The modified anterior teeth width was significantly different from measured values, when determined by using the three mid facial proportions with Preston and 70% recurring esthetic dental (RED) proportion. Furthermore, the measured width of maxillary anterior teeth showed no difference when plaster dental casts widths were compared with 3D models. The interpupillary, inner-intercanthal, and bizygomatic distance should not be directly used to determine maxillary anterior teeth width. While maxillary anterior teeth width can be determined by modifying the inner inter-canthal distance with golden percentage and interpupillary distance with golden proportion. Moreover, the midfacial third proportions modified with Preston and 70% recurrent esthetic dental proportion were found to be unreliable for the determination of maxillary anterior teeth widths.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.