Affiliations 

  • 1 Physician in private practice in Manila, Philippines
  • 2 Division of Cosmetic Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
  • 3 NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
  • 4 Physicians in private practice in Munich, Germany
  • 5 Physician in private practice in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 6 Department of Plastic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
  • 7 Physician in private practice in Medellin, Colombia
  • 8 Physician in private practice in Marbella, Spain
  • 9 Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
  • 10 Yuvell, Aesthetic Clinic and Clinical Trial Center, Vienna, Austria
  • 11 Clinical Research and Development, ICA Aesthetic Navigation GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
  • 12 Skin Associates of South Florida and Skin Research Institute, Coral Gables, FL
Aesthet Surg J, 2023 Apr 13.
PMID: 37052953 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad103

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of validated scales is still considered the gold standard in evaluating the severity of an aesthetic facial condition.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this investigation was to create and validate 5-point photo numeric scales which assess perioral lines and marionette lines.

METHODS: A medical team created two different novel 5-point photonumeric scale for the assessment of perioral lines and marionette lines. Eleven international raters were involved in the digital validation, while 4 raters performed a live validation.

RESULTS: For the Croma Static Perioral Lines-Assessment Scale digital inter-rater ICCs were 0.88 [95% CI: 0.85-0.91] in the first rating and 0.87 [0.83-0.90] in the second rating. The digital intra-rater ICCs were 0.90 [95% CI: 0.87-0.92]. In the live rating, the inter-rater ICCs were 0.89 [95% CI: 0.85-0.93] in the first rating and 0.91 [95% CI: 0.87-0.93] in the second rating with an intra-rater ICC of 0.91 [95% CI: 0.88-0.95]. For the Croma Marionette Lines-Assessment scale the digital rating inter-rater ICCs were 0.85 [95% CI: 0.81-0.89] in the first rating and 0.87 [95% CI: 0.84-0.90] in the second rating with an intra-rater ICC of 0.89 [95% CI: 0.88-0.91]. In the live rating, the inter-rater ICCs were 0.73 [95% CI: 0.54-0.83] in the first rating and 0.79 [95% CI: 0.65-0.87] in the second rating with an intra-rater ICC of 0.88 [95% CI: 0.83-0.94].

CONCLUSIONS: It is to be concluded that the Croma Static Perioral Lines-Assessment Scale and the Croma Marionette Lines-Assessment Scale have exceptional inter- and intra-rater agreements to be justifiably used in the clinical and study setting for all ethnic groups.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.