Affiliations 

  • 1 From the Clique Clinic, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2 Division of Cosmetic Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
  • 3 SkinConcept, Munich, Germany
  • 4 Private Practice for Dermatology and Aesthetics, Munich, Germany
  • 5 Department of Plastic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, N.Y
  • 6 Ocean Clinic, Marbella, Spain
  • 7 Yuvell, Aesthetic Clinic & Clinical Trial Center, Vienna, Austria
  • 8 Clinical Research and Development, ICA Aesthetic Navigation GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
  • 9 CH Dermatologia, Medellin, Colombia
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2023 Sep;11(9):e5287.
PMID: 37744770 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005287

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this investigation was to create and validate five-point photonumeric scales which assess static and dynamic forehead lines.

METHODS: Two different novel five-point photonumeric scales for the assessment of static and dynamic forehead lines were developed. Moreover, a photoguide was created, including subjects from both sexes, all age groups, and different Fitzpatrick skin types. A total of 11 raters from all over the world were involved in the digital validation, whereas four raters performed a live validation.

RESULTS: The Croma Static Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale showed almost perfect inter and intra-rater agreement in both the digital and the live setting with inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.89] in the first digital rating and 0.82 [95% CI: 0.78-0.86] in the second digital rating. The Croma Dynamic Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale showed almost perfect inter and intra-rater agreement in the digital setting with inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.83 [95% CI: 0.79-0.86] in the first digital rating and 0.80 [95% CI: 0.75-0.84] in the second rating and almost substantial agreement in the live setting.

CONCLUSIONS: The Croma Static Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale and the Croma Dynamic Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale have excellent inter and intra-rater agreements to be justifiably used in the clinical and study setting, both digitally and live across ethnic groups.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.