Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar Perak Darul Ridzuan Malaysia khairul.habib@utp.edu.my +60 53687146
  • 2 Research Centre for Nano-Materials and Energy Technology (RCNMET), School of Science and Technology, Sunway University Malaysia
  • 3 Petroleum Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar Perak Malaysia
  • 4 Department of Thermofluids, School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 81310 UTM Skudai Johor Bahru Malaysia
RSC Adv, 2019 Nov 25;9(66):38576-38589.
PMID: 35540235 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra07811h

Abstract

Covalent functionalization (CF-GNPs) and non-covalent functionalization (NCF-GNPs) approaches were applied to prepare graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs). The impact of using four surfactants (SDS, CTAB, Tween-80, and Triton X-100) was studied with four test times (15, 30, 60, and 90 min) and four weight concentrations. The stable thermal conductivity and viscosity were measured as a function of temperature. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy verified the fundamental efficient and stable CF. Several techniques, such as dispersion of particle size, FESEM, FETEM, EDX, zeta potential, and UV-vis spectrophotometry, were employed to characterize both the dispersion stability and morphology of functionalized materials. At ultrasonic test time, the highest stability of nanofluids was achieved at 60 min. As a result, the thermal conductivity displayed by CF-GNPs was higher than NCF-GNPs and distilled water. In conclusion, the improvement in thermal conductivity and stability displayed by CF-GNPs was higher than those of NCF-GNPs, while the lowest viscosity was 8% higher than distilled water, and the best thermal conductivity improvement was recorded at 29.2%.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.