Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
  • 2 Department of Radiation Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
  • 3 Department of Management Information Systems, College of Business Administration, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
  • 4 Computer Science Department, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq, Jordan
Front Med (Lausanne), 2023;10:1276434.
PMID: 38076239 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1276434

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in older women across varying breast densities and to compare its effectiveness for cancer detection with 2D mammography and ultrasound (U/S) for different breast density categories. Furthermore, our study aimed to predict the potential reduction in unnecessary additional examinations among older women due to DBT.

METHODS: This study encompassed a cohort of 224 older women. Each participant underwent both 2D mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis examinations. Supplementary views were conducted when necessary, including spot compression and magnification, ultrasound, and recommended biopsies. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for 2D mammography, DBT, and ultrasound. The impact of DBT on diminishing the need for supplementary imaging procedures was predicted through binary logistic regression.

RESULTS: In dense breast tissue, DBT exhibited notably heightened sensitivity and NPV for lesion detection compared to non-dense breasts (61.9% vs. 49.3%, p  0.05) between DBT and the four dependent variables.

CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that among older women, DBT does not significantly decrease the requirement for further medical examinations.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.