Affiliations 

  • 1 The School of Smart Health and Wellness (Health Medical College), Zhejiang Dongfang Polytechnic, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
  • 2 Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia
  • 3 Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 4 Faculty of Business and Management, UCSI University, Kulala Lumpur, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 5 International School of Public Health and One Health, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Province, China
  • 6 Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia. chewboonhow@upm.edu.my
BMC Nurs, 2024 Jan 13;23(1):40.
PMID: 38218894 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01676-0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smart nursing homes (SNHs) integrate advanced technologies, including IoT, digital health, big data, AI, and cloud computing to optimise remote clinical services, monitor abnormal events, enhance decision-making, and support daily activities for older residents, ensuring overall well-being in a safe and cost-effective environment. This study developed and validated a 24-item Expectation and Acceptability of Smart Nursing Homes Questionnaire (EASNH-Q), and examined the levels of expectations and acceptability of SNHs and associated factors among older adults in China.

METHODS: This was an exploratory sequential mixed methods study, where the qualitative case study was conducted in Hainan and Dalian, while the survey was conducted in Xi'an, Nanjing, Shenyang, and Xiamen. The validation of EASNH-Q also included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the determinants of expectations and acceptability of SNHs.

RESULTS: The newly developed EASNH-Q uses a Likert Scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), and underwent validation and refinement from 49 items to the final 24 items. The content validity indices for relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness were all above 0.95. The expectations and acceptability of SNHs exhibited a strong correlation (r = 0.85, p 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.