Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Department of Surgery, National University of Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore
  • 2 Clinical Oncology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Indonesia
  • 4 Section of Oncology, Veteran's Memorial Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
  • 5 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Muang, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  • 6 Genitourinary Surgery, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 7 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of the Philippines College of Medicine - Philippines General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
  • 8 Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Makati Medical Center, Manila, Philippines
  • 9 Department of Urology, Department of Surgery, Gleneagles Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 10 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Airlangga University Teaching Hospital, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
  • 11 Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
  • 12 Department of Oncology, Binh Dan Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 13 The Nuclear Medicine and Oncology Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 14 Department of Oncology, The Brunei Cancer Centre (TBCC), Pantai Jerudong Specialist Centre, Jerudong, Brunei
  • 15 Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
Ther Adv Med Oncol, 2024;16:17588359231216582.
PMID: 38249332 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231216582

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) has a serious public health impact, and its incidence is rising due to the aging population. There is limited evidence and consensus to guide the management of PC in Southeast Asia (SEA). We present real-world data on clinical practice patterns in SEA for advanced PC care.

METHOD: A paper-based survey was used to identify clinical practice patterns and obtain consensus among the panelists. The survey included the demographics of the panelists, the use of clinical guidelines, and clinical practice patterns in the management of advanced PC in SEA.

RESULTS: Most panelists (81%) voted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as the most effective test for early PC diagnosis and risk stratification. Nearly 44% of panelists agreed that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging for PC diagnostic and staging information aids local and systemic therapy decisions. The majority of the panel preferred abiraterone acetate (67%) or docetaxel (44%) as first-line therapy for symptomatic mCRPC patients. Abiraterone acetate (50%) is preferred over docetaxel as a first-line treatment in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients with high-volume disease. However, the panel did not support the use of abiraterone acetate in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients. Apalutamide (75%) is the preferred treatment option for patients with nmCRPC. The cost and availability of modern treatments and technologies are important factors influencing therapeutic decisions. All panelists supported the use of generic versions of approved therapies.

CONCLUSION: The survey results reflect real-world management of advanced PC in a SEA country. These findings could be used to guide local clinical practices and highlight the financial challenges of modern healthcare.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.