Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
  • 2 Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • 3 Department of Urology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • 4 Divisions of Radiation Oncology and Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
  • 5 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Airlangga University Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • 6 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia - Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 7 Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea
  • 8 Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • 9 Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
  • 10 Department of Uro-oncology, Siddhi Vinayak Ganapati Cancer Hospital, Miraj, India
  • 11 Section of Urology, Chinese General Hospital and Medical Center, Manila, Philippines
  • 12 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  • 13 Department of Urology, Selayang Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 14 SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 15 Department of Urology, Binh dan Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 16 Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
  • 17 Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
  • 18 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 19 Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 20 Men's Health Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • 21 Department of Urology, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan
  • 22 Department of Urology, Acıbadem M.A. Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 23 Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • 24 Department of Haematology Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore
  • 25 Department of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
  • 26 ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 2022 Dec;18(6):686-695.
PMID: 35134266 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13722

Abstract

AIM: The second Asia-Pacific Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APAC APCCC 2020) gathered insights into the real-world application in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region of consensus statements from the 3rd Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2019).

METHODS: The 4-h our virtual meeting in October 2020 brought together 26 experts from 14 APAC countries to discuss APCCC 2019 recommendations. Presentations were prerecorded and viewed prior to the meeting. A postmeeting survey gathered views on current practice.

RESULTS: The meeting and survey highlighted several developments since APAC APCCC 2018. Increased access and use in the region of PSMA PET/CT imaging is providing additional diagnostic and staging information for advanced prostate cancer and influencing local and systemic therapy choices. Awareness of oligometastatic disease, although not clearly defined, is increasing. Novel androgen receptor pathway antagonists are expanding treatment options. Cost and access to contemporary treatments and technologies continue to be a significant factor influencing therapeutic decisions in the region. With treatment options increasing, multidisciplinary treatment planning, shared decision making, and informed choice remain critical. A discussion on the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted challenges for diagnosis, treatment, and clinical trials and new service delivery models that will continue beyond the pandemic.

CONCLUSION: APAC-specific prostate cancer research and data are important to ensure that treatment guidelines and recommendations reflect local populations and resources. Facilitated approaches to collaboration across the region such as that achieved through APAC APCCC meetings continue to be a valuable mechanism to ensure the relevance of consensus guidelines within the region.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.